Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32431971›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Association of Clinical and Radiological Features in Various Repetitive Stress Injuries.

Nazia Azeem, Madiha Ariff

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nazia AzeemRadiology, Sir Syed Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Madiha AriffInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives  To assess the clinical and radiological features of repetitive stress injuries (RSIs), specifically de Quervain's (DQ) disease, tennis elbow (TE), and plantar fasciitis (PF). Methods This was an observational study conducted for eight months (March 2019 to September 2019) at the Orthopedic Department in collaboration with the Radiology Department. Clinically diagnosed RSI patients from both genders, aged between 30 and 50 years, were included in the study. Clinical features that were considered include pain, swelling, and site of injury. Radiological findings from ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified in all participants of the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data were represented as frequency and percentages. Results There were a total of 82 patients (40 males,42 females) with repetitive stress injury (RSI), with a mean age of 42.63±8.53 years. Of the 82 patients, 34 (41.4%) had DQ disease, 28 (34.1%) had TE, and 20 (24.4%) had PF. Pain and swelling were observed in all patients. In TE, the most affected site was the right lateral epicondyle process. The common radiological findings were hypoechoic fascia, increased fluid within the first extensor tendon compartment, cortical erosion, sclerosis in soft tissues, and calcification in soft tissues. Cozen's test was positive in most patients. In DQ, the most affected sites were left and right radial styloid processes. The common radiological findings were hypoechoic fascia, increased fluid within the first extensor, cortical erosion, and periosteal reaction. Finkelstein's test was also positive in most patients. In PT, the most affected site was the left heal plantar surface. The common radiological findings were hypoechoic fascia, increased thickness of fascia (>4.5 mm), increased fluid within the first extensor tendon compartment, cortical erosion, sclerosis in soft tissues, calcaneal spur, periosteal reaction, and calcification in soft tissues. Cozen's and Finkelstein's tests were also positive in most patients. Conclusions History, physical examination, laboratory findings, and imaging modalities all are important tools for the differential diagnosis of RSI. Our study results showed that if some clinical findings fail to diagnose any RSI, then ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the best and useful options before treatment.

Indexed as

de quervain diseaseplantar fasciitisrepetitive stress injurytennis elbow

Identifiers

PMID32431971
PMCPMC7233502
OpenAlexW3017344386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.