Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32431876›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin

Laura Schlingloff, Gergely Csibra, Denis Tatone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infants use helping to infer the existence and strength of caring relationships.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Better Together: 14-Month-Old Infants Expect Agents to Cooperate.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  8. Toddlers Prefer Agents Who Help Those Facing Harder Tasks.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Infants' neural responses to helping and hindering scenarios.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura SchlingloffCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7512-2617
Gergely CsibraCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-3056
Denis TatoneCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-2656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hamlin

Indexed as

infant cognitionmanual choice paradigmmoral judgementpartner choicesocial evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32431876
PMCPMC7211864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.