ArticleComparative cytogenetics2020
Karyotype and putative chromosomal inversion suggested by integration of cytogenetic and molecular data of the fungus-farming ant
Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic conservation and diversification of 18S rDNA loci in leaf-cutting ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): insights from molecular validation and chromosomal mapping using FISH.Comparative cytogenetics · 2026Article
- Molecular cytogenetic study on the scleractinian coralComparative cytogenetics · 2025Article
- Shifts in Chromosome Evolution Rates Shape the Karyotype Patterns of Leafcutting Ants.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Multiple heterochromatin diversification events in the genome of fungus-farming ants: insights from repetitive sequences.Chromosoma · 2022Article
- Article
- Distribution of GC-rich heterochromatin and ribosomal genes in three fungus-farming ants (Myrmicinae, Attini, Attina): insights on chromosomal evolution.Comparative cytogenetics · 2021Article
- Comparative FISH-mapping of TTAGG telomeric sequences to the chromosomes of leafcutter ants (Formicidae, Myrmicinae): is the insect canonical sequence conserved?Comparative cytogenetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative cytogenetic analyses are being increasingly used to collect information on species evolution, for example, diversification of closely related lineages and identification of morphologically indistinguishable species or lineages. Here, we have described the karyotype of the fungus-farming ant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.