Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32431780›Full record

ArticleBayesian analysis2019

Hierarchical Normalized Completely Random Measures for Robust Graphical Modeling.

Andrea Cremaschi, Raffaele Argiento, Katherine Shoemaker, Christine Peterson, Marina Vannucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bayesian analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Covariate-Assisted Bayesian Graph Learning for Heterogeneous Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.Statistical methods & applications · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea CremaschiDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Raffaele ArgientoESOMAS Department, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Katherine ShoemakerDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Christine PetersonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Marina VannucciDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Biostatistics for Cancer ResearchT32CA096520 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KIMMEL, MAREK, YUAN, YING · 2003 to 2023
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA096520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian graphical models are useful tools for exploring network structures in multivariate normal data. In this paper we are interested in situations where data show departures from Gaussianity, therefore requiring alternative modeling distributions. The multivariate

Indexed as

Bayesian nonparametricsgraphical modelshierarchical modelsnormalized completely random measuresradiomics datat-distribution

Identifiers

PMID32431780
PMCPMC7237071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.