ArticleEvolutionary applications2020
Secondary contacts and genetic admixture shape colonization by an amphiatlantic epibenthic invertebrate.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Pooled it
- Limited capacity for rapid acclimation to marine heatwaves in coastal invertebrates.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Admixture and Selection Driven by El Niño-Southern Oscillation Events Shape the Genetic Structure ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ten years of demographic modelling of divergence and speciation in the sea.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Invader at the edge - Genomic origins and physiological differences of round gobies across a steep urban salinity gradient.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Ten years of marine evolutionary biology-Challenges and achievements of a multidisciplinary research initiative.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Managing human-mediated range shifts: understanding spatial, temporal and genetic variation in marine non-native species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Mitonuclear genetic patterns of divergence in the marbled crab, Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Fabricius, 1787) along the Turkish seas.PloS one · 2022Article
- Comparative Microbiome and Metabolome Analyses of the Marine TunicateMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Historical human activities reshape evolutionary trajectories across both native and introduced ranges.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- An evolutionary perspective on marine invasions.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Secondary contacts and genetic admixture shape colonization by an amphiatlantic epibenthic invertebrate.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on the genetics of invasive species often focuses on patterns of genetic diversity and population structure within the introduced range. However, a growing body of literature is demonstrating the need to study how native genotypes affect both ecological and evolutionary mechanisms within the introduced range. Here, we used genotyping-by-sequencing to study both native and introduced ranges of the amphiatlantic marine invertebrate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.