Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32431705›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Complement Receptor 2 Based Immunoassay Measuring Activation of the Complement System at C3-Level in Plasma Samples From Mice and Humans.

Lene Halkjær, Anne Troldborg, Henrik Pedersen, Lisbeth Jensen, Annette Gudmann Hansen, Troels Krarup Hansen, Mette Bjerre, Jakob Appel Østergaard, Steffen Thiel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lene HalkjærDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne TroldborgDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henrik PedersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisbeth JensenDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Annette Gudmann HansenDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Troels Krarup HansenSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette BjerreDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob Appel ØstergaardDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Steffen ThielDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKSteno Diabetes Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed at establishing a sensitive and robust assay for estimation of systemic complement activation at complement component C3 level in mouse and human plasma samples. In order to capture the activation products iC3b and C3dg in a specific and physiological relevant manner we utilized a construct consisting of the iC3b/C3dg-binding site of human complement receptor 2 (CR2) attached to an Fc-part of mouse IgG. This construct binds C3dg and iC3b from both mice and humans. We purified the CR2-IgG construct from mouse B myeloma cell line supernatants, J558L-CR2-IgG, by protein G affinity chromatography. The CR2-IgG construct was used for capturing C3 fragments in microtiter wells and an anti-mouse or an anti-human-C3 antibody was used for detection of bound C3 fragments. Initially we tested the specificity of the assays with the use of purified C3 fragments. Further, with the use of the CR2-based assay, we measured an up to three-fold higher signal in activated mouse serum as compared to non-activated mouse serum, whereas activated serum from a C3 knock-out mouse gave no signal. We tested

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesComplement ActivationComplement C3bCross-Sectional StudiesElapid VenomsFluoroimmunoassayGene Knockout TechniquesHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMicecobra venom factorComplement C3bcomplement C3d,gElapid VenomsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Complement 3dC3dgcomplement activationcomplement receptor 2humaniC3bimmunoassaymouse

Identifiers

PMID32431705
PMCPMC7214740
OpenAlexW3022437989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.