Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32431547›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Pitfalls in the Application of Single Tracers.

Jiqiao Yang, Li Xu, Pengcheng Liu, Zhenggui Du, Jie Chen, Faqing Liang, Quanyi Long, Di Zhang, Helin Zeng, Qing Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jiqiao YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Li XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Pengcheng LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Zhenggui DuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Faqing LiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Quanyi LongDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Helin ZengDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Qing LvDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadioisotopes and blue dyes are used as dual tracers in the current gold standard procedure of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) performed for breast cancer. However, the blue dye or the radioisotope as a single tracer is also being applied in some institutes. We aimed to explore the risk factors for the miss-detection of SLNs with the radioisotope and the blue dye and to describe the distribution of SLNs missed by each tracer. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients undergoing SLNB with radioisotope and blue dye as dual mapping agents were enrolled between August 2010 and August 2018. Radioactivity count, blue dye staining status, and size and location of each SLN were prospectively documented.

resultsIn total, 2382 SLNs from 1010 patients were included for statistical analyses. The sentinel node identification rate was 100% for dual tracers, 99.4% for radioisotope, and 89.1% for blue dye. SLN identification using the blue dye was more likely to fail in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (

conclusionThis study explored the association between features and the incidence of the failure to detect SLNs using radioisotope and blue dye. The locations of the miss-detected SLNs are demonstrated to provide a reference for SLNBs conducted using blue dye or radioisotope as a single tracer.

Indexed as

blue dyebreast cancerradioisotopesentinel lymph nodesingle tracer

Identifiers

PMID32431547
PMCPMC7200249
OpenAlexW3021259239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.