ArticleJournal of food science and technology2020
Analytical method validation, dissipation and safety evaluation of combination fungicides fenamidone + mancozeb and iprovalicarb + propineb in/on tomato.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis, residue behaviour and risk assessment of combination product of iprovalicarb + copper oxychloride in representative fruiting vegetables, cucurbit and in soil using LC-MS/MS and ICP-MS.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Interaction between Six Waxy Components in Summer Black Grapes (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of iprovalicarb + propineb fungicide in tomato under different agroclimates.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissipation behavior and degradation kinetics of fenamidone + mancozeb (Sectin 60 WG) and iprovalicarb + propineb (Melody Duo 66.75 WP) in tomato were studied at recommended dose (RD) and double dose (DD) of application. The analysis of the field samples were carried out by employing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for fenamidone and iprovalicarb residues and gas chromatography mass spectrometry for mancozeb and propineb residues after thorough validation of the extraction methods. The dissipation of residues best followed 1st + 1st order for all the test fungicides. The half-life period for fenamidone, mancozeb, iprovalicarb and propineb were 2, 2, 1.5 and 2 days for RD and 3, 2.5, 2 and 3 days for DD, respectively. The pre-harvest intervals were not applicable for iprovalicarb, fenamidone and mancozeb (at RD) as the residues at 0 day were below maximum residue limit set by European Union, and it was 1 day for DD of iprovalicarb, 3.5 days for DD of fenamidone, 3 days for DD of mancozeb, 3 and 7 days for propineb at RD and DD, respectively. A PHI of 4 and 7 days are proposed for fenamidone + Mancozeb and iprovalicarb + propineb, respectively. Dietary exposure calculated for all the pesticides were safe on all the sampling days except for propineb residues for which it was safe after first day of the double dose application. The study will be useful for promoting effective residue management and safe use of these chemicals for controlling fungal diseases in tomato crop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.