ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Clinical Experience with Thymic Cystectomy: A Single-Institution Study of 117 Cases from 2013 to 2019.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical indications for mediastinal cysts-a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to summarize the clinical experience of thymic cysts treatment from a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data, imaging, pathological results, and follow-up results of thymic cyst patients who underwent surgery from January 2013 to September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 117 patients were enrolled, including 76 asymptomatic patients and 41 symptomatic patients. The average diameter of thymic cysts, the cysts in asymptomatic patients, and those in symptomatic patients were 31.93±19.92 mm, 29.28±17.97 mm, and 36.85±22.50 mm, respectively. The number of cysts ranged from 1 to 3 cm, 3 to 6 cm, and >6 cm in 73 cases (62.4%), 32 cases (27.3%), and 12 cases (10.3%), respectively. There was no correlation between the size of thymic cysts and the presence or absence of symptoms. Only 20 cases (17.1%) were correctly diagnosed as thymic cysts before surgery. There were 67 patients (57.3%) who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and 50 cases (42.7%) underwent open surgery. Cystectomy was performed in 93 cases (79.5%) and 24 cases (20.5%) underwent simultaneous resection of thymic cysts and other thoracic tumors. Compared with the thoracotomy group, the VATS group had shorter hospital stay and chest tube indwelling time. No serious complications occurred after surgery. The median follow-up time was 45.0 months (range 4.0-84.0 months) and there was no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Attention should be paid to the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of thymic cysts and the reduction of asymptomatic thymic cystectomy. For patients who have both thymic cysts and other thoracic tumors, simultaneous surgery is safe and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.