ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Performance evaluation of three i-SENS glucometers using arterial blood samples compared with the YSI 2300 Glucose Analyzer.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance evaluation of three i-SENS glucometers using arterial blood samples compared with the YSI 2300 Glucose Analyzer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Point-of-Care Diagnostics of COVID-19: From Current Work to Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCapillary blood is the most commonly used sample for point-of-care (POC) glucometers. However, in critically ill patients, the glucose levels measured from capillary blood may not be reliable. Thus, we aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of glucose levels measured with POC glucometers and the YSI 2300 glucose analyzer using leftover arterial blood samples.
methodsIn total, 100 leftover heparinized arterial blood samples were used to evaluate the performance of three i-SENS glucometers (BAROzen H Expert plus, CareSens PRO, and CareSens H Beat) and the ACCU-CHEK
resultsMore than 95% of results obtained using POC glucometers were within ±15 mg/dL of the reference value for glucose concentrations <100 mg/dL and within ±15% of the reference value for glucose concentrations ≥100 mg/dL. In the consensus error grid analysis, more than 99% of results were found to be within zones A and B. An excellent correlation was found between the values obtained using POC glucometers and the YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (R
conclusionThe i-SENS glucometers showed stable and accurate results when leftover arterial blood samples were used. Therefore, POC glucometers could be useful in critical care settings, such as intensive care units, where arterial samples are routinely used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.