ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Fast T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Voxel-Wise T2 Distribution Framework for Lesion Severity Stratification and Treatment-Response Assessment in Stroke: Insights Into Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid-Induced Neuroprotection.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Combined ADC and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Combining Oxygen-Enhanced MRI and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oximetry for Quantitative OE-MRI (qOE-MRI) as a Method for Mapping Absolute Oxygen Levels (pOMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping in a phantom and human knee articular cartilage.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Navigator motion-resolved MR fingerprinting using implicit neural representation: Feasibility for free-breathing three-dimensional whole-liver multiparametric mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-center and multi-vendor evaluation study across 1.5 T and 3 T scanners (part 2): T1 and T2 standardization in the ISMRM/NIST MR phantom.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Validation of conductivity tensor imaging against diffusion tensor magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Analysis Platform for Estimation of Robust Imaging Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Joint estimation of relaxation and diffusion tissue parameters for prostate cancer with relaxation-VERDICT MRI.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Study of T2 mapping in quantifying and discriminating uterine lesions under different magnetic field strengths: 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- MR relaxation times of agar-based tissue-mimicking phantoms.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Quantification of HEuropean radiology experimental · 2021Article
- Fast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Investigation of the Value of T 2 Mapping in the Prediction of Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMulti-echo spin-echo sequence is commonly used for T
methodsWe developed FAMESE based on mathematical analysis of the Bloch equations in which the search space dimension decreased to only one. Then, we tested it in both phantom and human brain. Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreement between the estimated T
resultsIn both phantom and healthy participants, FAMESE provided accelerated and SNR-resistant T
conclusionOur developed method FAMESE could be considered as a candidate for rapid T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.