Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430886›Full record

Observational studyEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

Impulsive behaviors and clinical outcomes following a flexible intensive inpatient treatment for eating disorders: findings from an observational study.

Patrizia Todisco, Paolo Meneguzzo, Alice Garolla, Athos Antoniades, Paris Vogazianos, Federica Tozzi

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Urinary free cortisol and childhood maltreatments in eating disorder patients: New evidence for an ecophenotype subgroup.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrizia TodiscoEating Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Margherita", via Costacolonna 20, Arcugnano, VI, Italy.
Paolo MeneguzzoEating Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Margherita", via Costacolonna 20, Arcugnano, VI, Italy. meneguzzo.p@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3323-6071
Alice GarollaEating Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Margherita", via Costacolonna 20, Arcugnano, VI, Italy.
Athos AntoniadesResearch and Development, Stremble Ventures, Limassol, Cyprus.
Paris VogazianosBehavioral Sciences Department, European University Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus.
Federica TozziResearch and Development, Stremble Ventures, Limassol, Cyprus.
European University Cyprus · CYUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to assess the differences between impulsive and non-impulsive patients in response to a multidisciplinary intensive inpatient treatment for eating disorders (EDs).

methods320 patients with EDs were consecutively recruited in an eating disorders unit (EDU). They were assessed by clinical interviews and self-reported questionnaires. The treatment was characterized by a patient-centric approach and included both an intensive and comprehensive standardized multidisciplinary program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy and a flexible and personalized component according to the needs and the history of each patient.

resultsImpulsive ED patients showed greater improvement in specific psychopathological areas, in particular: interpersonal sensitivity of Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) (p = 0.007); Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) Global Score (p = 0.009), EDE-Q eating concern (p < 0.001) and EDE-Q shape concern (p = 0.025). The two groups also showed a different pattern on the Body Uneasiness Test, with impulsive patients uniquely showing improvement on Global Severity Index (p = 0.006), body image concern (p = 0.008), compulsive self monitoring (p = 0.002), and weight phobia (p = 0.037). DISCUSSION: Results support the hypothesis that patients with impulsive behaviors might benefit from treatments characterized by a standardized cognitive behavioral therapy implemented by third-wave interventions according to each patient's clinical profile. Personalized treatment approaches could be an answer to the complexity of ED, addressing individual psychopathology. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersInpatientsHumansImpulsive BehaviorPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesEating disordersImpulsive behaviorsInpatient treatmentMultidisciplinary patient-tailored treatmentOutcome

Identifiers

PMID32430886
OpenAlexW3028512820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.