SynthesisNeurocritical care2021
Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- VIEshunt: towards a ventricular intelligent and electromechanical shunt for hydrocephalus therapy.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Telemetric ICP monitoring in children: a national questionnaire-based study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Parent perception of telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in children - A qualitative case study.Brain & spine · 2024Article
- Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a step change in understanding the disease mechanisms.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Interpretation of telemetric intracranial pressure recordings in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension after shunt implantation.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Evaluation of diurnal and postural intracranial pressure employing telemetric monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2022Observational
- A Review of Digital Health and Biotelemetry: Modern Approaches towards Personalized Medicine and Remote Health Assessment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Neurosurgical CSF Diversion in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.