Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430726›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020

Pesticide bioaccumulation in epilithic biofilms as a biomarker of agricultural activities in a representative watershed.

Danilo Rheinheimer Dos Santos, José Augusto Monteiro de Castro Lima, Jocelina Paranhos Rosa de Vargas, Marilia Camotti Bastos, Maria Alice Santanna Dos Santos, Leslie Mondamert, Jérôme Labanowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Organic composition of epilithic biofilms from agricultural and urban watershed in South Brazil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danilo Rheinheimer Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Av. Roraima nº 1000. Cidade Universitária, Bairro Camobi. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Prédio 42, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
José Augusto Monteiro de Castro LimaUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Av. Roraima nº 1000. Cidade Universitária, Bairro Camobi. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Prédio 42, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jocelina Paranhos Rosa de VargasUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Av. Roraima nº 1000. Cidade Universitária, Bairro Camobi. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Prédio 42, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. jocelinaparanhos@mail.ufsm.br.
Marilia Camotti BastosUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Av. Roraima nº 1000. Cidade Universitária, Bairro Camobi. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Prédio 42, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Maria Alice Santanna Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Av. Roraima nº 1000. Cidade Universitária, Bairro Camobi. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Prédio 42, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Leslie MondamertUniversité de Poitiers, IC2MP UMR 7285 ENSI Poitiers Bâtiment B16 7, rue Marcel Doré TSA, 41105 86073, Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Jérôme LabanowskiUniversité de Poitiers, IC2MP UMR 7285 ENSI Poitiers Bâtiment B16 7, rue Marcel Doré TSA, 41105 86073, Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Institut de Chimie des Milieux et des Matériaux de Poitiers · FRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil is one of the largest consumers of pesticides in the world. The high rainfall rate and inadequate soil use and management promote the transfer of these compounds to the aquatic system. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify pesticides present in epilithic biofilms in order to evaluate the effectiveness of this matrix as a bioindicator able to discriminate areas and periods with different inputs of pesticides. Among the 25 pesticides analyzed in the biofilms, 20 compounds were detected. The epilithic biofilms picked up pesticides independent of their polarities, even in the period of lower use. The frequency and median concentration of five herbicides (2,4-D, atrazine, desethyl-atrazine, simazine, nicosulfuron), three fungicides (carbendazim, epoxiconazole, tebuconazole), and one insecticide (imidacloprid) were highest in biofilms sampled in summer crops during the growing period. Biofilms collected in the upper region of the catchment, where genetically modified soybean and corn cultivated in a no-tillage system prevail, the highest frequency and median concentration of three herbicides (2,4-D, thifensulfuron, isoproturon), four fungicides (carbendazim, epoxiconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole), and one insecticide (imidacloprid) were observed. Despite the excessive amounts of pesticides used in the catchment, the median values of all pesticides in the epilithic biofilm were considered low. The lower diversity and concentration of pesticides observed in the autumn/winter season is representative of lower use of pesticides, barriers to pesticide transfer from soil to water, and the biofilm's resilience capacity to decompose pesticides.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiofilmsPesticidesBioaccumulationBiomarkersBrazilEnvironmental MonitoringWater MovementsBiomarkersPesticidesContaminationRiparian forestRunoffSoil erosionSoil use management

Identifiers

PMID32430726
OpenAlexW3026856062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.