Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430685›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2020

Women's responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information.

T Yanes, R Kaur, B Meiser, M Scheepers-Joynt, S McInerny, K Barlow-Stewart, Y Antill, L Salmon, C Smyth, P A James and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward polygenic risk scores for breast cancer in multiethnic high-risk cohorts of women.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

T YanesPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. t.yanes@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-3025
R KaurPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
B MeiserPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
M Scheepers-JoyntParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
S McInernyParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
K Barlow-StewartNorthern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Y AntillFamily Cancer Clinic, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3144, Australia.
L SalmonClinical Genetics Service, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia.
C SmythFamily Cancer Clinic, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
P A JamesParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
M A YoungParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUAustin Hospital · AUCabrini Hospital · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that polygenic factors can explain up to 18% of familial breast cancer. Clinical implementation of polygenic testing has begun, with several commercial laboratories now testing. Despite commercial implementation, there is little research investigating how women respond and understand polygenic risk information. This study aimed to explore women's experience receiving their personalised polygenic risk score (PRS) and compare responses of women at different levels of polygenic risk. Eligible participants were affected and unaffected women from families clinically assessed to be at high risk for breast cancer who had received their personalised PRS as part of the Variants in Practice Psychosocial Study (ViPPs). In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 women (mean age 53.4 years) up to four weeks after receiving their PRS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Eleven women received a PRS that was in the top quartile of PRS distribution and 10 in the lowest quartile. Women's lived experience with breast cancer informed how they responded to their PRS, constructed and made sense of breast cancer risk following receipt of their PRS, and integrated this new information into their breast cancer risk management. Regardless of polygenic risk level, all participants demonstrated broad knowledge of concepts related to polygenic information and were able to accurately describe the implications of their PRS. Receiving PRS did not appear to negatively impact women's reported distress levels. Our findings suggest polygenic breast cancer information is well received and understood by women at high-risk for breast cancer.

Indexed as

ComprehensionAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedMotivationPsychosocial InterventionQualitative ResearchRiskRisk AssessmentBreast cancerPolygenic risk scoresPsychosocial researchQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32430685
OpenAlexW3028083382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.