ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2020
Seminal plasma fractions can protect common carp (Cyprinus carpio) sperm during cryopreservation.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of fractionated seminal plasma on characteristics of common carp Cyprinus carpio cryopreserved sperm. Nanosep® centrifugal devices yielded four seminal plasma fractions with different total protein content ranging in molecular weight from less than 17 to almost 74 kDa. Each protein fraction was added to semen extender medium prior to freezing. Spermatozoon motility characteristics and DNA integrity were analyzed in supplemented and non-supplemented cryopreserved samples. The cryopreservation process strongly affected the swim-up sperm quality. Treatment with fractions 1, 2, 3, and 4 was associated with significantly higher spermatozoon motility rate and curvilinear velocity than seen in extender only, with highest values obtained with fraction 4 (78.21 ± 2.41% and 168.05 ± 4.46 μm/s, respectively). Significantly less DNA damage, expressed as percent tail DNA (12.23 ± 1.27) and olive tail moment (0.68 ± 0.12), was recorded in fraction 4. The findings indicated that addition of fractionated seminal plasma to cryopreservation medium can preserve the quality of common carp sperm. The protective effect of each fraction varied, suggesting the presence of distinct components exerting different effects on cryopreserved sperm function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.