Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430629›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020

Cost-effectiveness and Outcomes with Early or Same-Day Discharge After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Santhosh K G Koshy, Lekha K George, Pranab Das

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santhosh K G KoshyJT and Margaret Talkington Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA. santhosh.koshy@ttuhsc.edu.
Lekha K GeorgeJT and Margaret Talkington Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Pranab DasDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewShorter hospital stay after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can provide economic advantage. Same-day discharge (SDD) after transradial PCI is thought to reduce the cost of care while maintaining the quality and safety. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the benefits and safety of this concept. RECENT

findingsIncrease in rate of transradial PCI over the last two decades has resulted in recent growth in rate of acceptance of SDD after a successful procedure. SDD is shown to result in savings of $3500 to $5200 per procedure with comparable adverse event rate of traditional discharge processes. SDD after PCI is shown to be safe and results in cost advantage maintaining the safety profile. The acceptance rate of SDD is still not optimum, and further market penetration of SDD practice would be achieved only if the institutional and operator preference barriers are addressed.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsElective Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayPatient DischargePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRadial ArteryStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCost-effectivenessHospital dischargeOutcomesPercutaneous coronary interventionQuality of careRadial artery catheterization

Identifiers

PMID32430629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.