Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430601›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

How, when, and why individuals with stage IV cancer seen in an outpatient setting are referred to palliative care: a mixed methods study.

Ellis C Dillon, Amy Meehan, Jinnan Li, Su-Ying Liang, Steve Lai, Natalia Colocci, Julie Roth, Nina K Szwerinski, Hal Luft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Performance Status as an Indicator for Palliative Care Referral.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellis C DillonCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA. dillone@sutterhealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-0869
Amy MeehanCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jinnan LiLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Su-Ying LiangCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Steve LaiPalo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Natalia ColocciPalo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Julie RothPalo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Nina K SzwerinskiCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Hal LuftCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sutter Health · USPalo Alto Institute · USPalo Alto Veterans Institute for Research · US

Funding

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Philanthropy funded
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly palliative care (PC) for individuals with advanced cancer improves patient and family outcomes and experience. However, it is unknown when, why, and how in an outpatient setting individuals with stage IV cancer are referred to PC.

methodsAt a large multi-specialty group in the USA with outpatient PC implemented beginning in 2011, clinical records were used to identify adults diagnosed with stage IV cancer after January 1, 2012 and deceased by December 31, 2017 and their PC referrals and hospice use. In-depth interviews were also conducted with 25 members of medical oncology, gynecological oncology, and PC teams and thematically analyzed.

resultsA total of 705 individuals were diagnosed and died between 2012 and 2017: of these, 332 (47%) were referred to PC, with 48.5% referred early (within 60 days of diagnosis). Among referred patients, 79% received hospice care, versus 55% among patients not referred. Oncologists varied dramatically in their rates of referral to PC. Interviews revealed four referral pathways: early referrals, referrals without active anti-cancer treatment, problem-based referrals, and late referrals (when stopping treatment). Participants described PC's benefits as enhancing pain/symptom management, advance care planning, transitions to hospice, end-of-life experiences, a larger team, and more flexible patient care. Challenges reported included variation in oncologist practices, patient fears and misconceptions, and access to PC teams.

conclusionWe found high rates of use and appreciation of PC. However, interviews revealed that exclusively focusing on rates of referrals may obscure how referrals vary in timing, reason for referral, and usefulness to patients, families, and clinical teams.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationAdvance Care PlanningAgedFemaleHospice CareHumansMaleNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOutpatientsPalliative CareCancerInterviewsOncologyPalliative careQualitativeReferral

Identifiers

PMID32430601
OpenAlexW3027026778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.