Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430557›Full record

Trial reportCommunity mental health journal2021

Engaging Community Networks to Improve Depression Services: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Community Engagement and Planning Intervention.

Peter Mendel, Jennifer O'Hora, Lily Zhang, Susan Stockdale, Elizabeth L Dixon, Jim Gilmore, Felica Jones, Andrea Jones, Pluscedia Williams, Mienah Zulfacar Sharif and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Community mental health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01699789 (CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01699789 nacompletednot on this map

CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) Project of Community and Academic Partners Working Together to Learn the Best Way to Reduce Depression in Our Communities.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2009 to 2016Enrolled1,246ConditionsDepression, Information Dissemination, Social Determinants of HealthArmsQuality Improvement Program, Resources for Services Expert Team, Community Engagement and Planning Council
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Peter MendelRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA. mendel@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-9559
Jennifer O'HoraCenter for Health Services and Society, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, USA.
Lily ZhangCenter for Health Services and Society, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, USA.
Susan StockdaleGreater Los Angeles Veteran's Affairs, Los Angeles, USA.
Elizabeth L DixonSchool of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Jim GilmoreBehavioral Health Services, Gardena, CA, USA.
Felica JonesHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrea JonesHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pluscedia WilliamsHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mienah Zulfacar SharifCentre for Social Research and Methods, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Zoe MasongsongHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Farbod KadkhodaCenter for Health Services and Society, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, USA.
Esmeralda PulidoUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bowen ChungRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA.
Kenneth B WellsRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SPRINGGATE, BENJAMIN F · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
RESEARCH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT CORE (PAGE 472)P30MH068639 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUAN, NAIHUA · 2003 to 2007
$8.0M
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARER01MH078853 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2007 to 2011
$6.0M
Pathways to Reducing Disparities in Depression OutcomesR01MD007721 · NIMHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI MIRANDA, JEANNE, WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
DREW_UCLA Connect_Community Partnered Resources to Improve Depression OutcomesG08LM011058 · NLM · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHUNG, BOWEN, MELDRUM, MARCIA L · 2011 to 2013
$279k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007721NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH068639NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078853NLM NIH HHS G08 LM011058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the effects of a group-randomized controlled trial, Community Partners in Care (CPIC), on the development of interagency networks for collaborative depression care improvement between a community engagement and planning (CEP) intervention and a resources for services (RS) intervention that provided the same content solely via technical assistance to individual programs. Both interventions consisted of a diverse set of service agencies, including health, mental health, substance abuse treatment, social services, and community-trusted organizations such as churches and parks and recreation centers. Participants in the community councils for the CEP intervention reflected a range of agency leaders, staff, and other stakeholders. Network analysis of partnerships among agencies in the CEP versus RS condition, and qualitative analysis of perspectives on interagency network changes from multiple sources, suggested that agencies in the CEP intervention exhibited greater growth in partnership capacity among themselves than did RS agencies. CEP participants also viewed the coalition development intervention both as promoting collaboration in depression services and as a meaningful community capacity building activity. These descriptive results help to identify plausible mechanisms of action for the CPIC interventions and can be used to guide development of future community engagement interventions and evaluations in under-resourced communities.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesDepressionCommunity NetworksHumansMental HealthQuality of LifeCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity engagementCommunity of practiceDepression carePartnership networksQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32430557
PMCPMC7906961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.