Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430553›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

DNA damage and DNA protection from digested raw and griddled green pepper (poly)phenols in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29).

Estíbaliz Huarte, Concepción Cid, Amaya Azqueta, María-Paz de Peña

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Food science and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Estíbaliz HuarteDepartamento de Ciencias de la Alimentación y Fisiología, Facultad de Farmacia y Nutrición, Universidad de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-1805
Concepción CidDepartamento de Ciencias de la Alimentación y Fisiología, Facultad de Farmacia y Nutrición, Universidad de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-5412
Amaya AzquetaDepartamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad de Farmacia y Nutrición, Universidad de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. amazqueta@unav.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-9931
María-Paz de PeñaDepartamento de Ciencias de la Alimentación y Fisiología, Facultad de Farmacia y Nutrición, Universidad de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-4268
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AGL2014-52636-PMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AGL2015-70640-RMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RYC-2013-14370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether (poly)phenols from gastrointestinal-digested green pepper possess genoprotective properties in human colon cells and whether the application of a culinary treatment (griddling) on the vegetable influences the potential genoprotective activity.

methods(Poly)phenols of raw and griddled green pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) submitted to in vitro-simulated gastrointestinal digestion were characterized by LC-MS/MS. Cytotoxicity (MTT, trypan blue and cell proliferation assays), DNA damage and DNA protection (standard alkaline and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg)-modified comet assay) of different concentrations of (poly)phenolic extracts were assessed in colon HT-29 cells.

resultsA total of 32 (poly)phenolic compounds were identified and quantified in digested raw and griddled green pepper. Twenty of them were flavonoids and 12 were phenolic acids. Griddled pepper doubled the (poly)phenol concentration compared to raw; luteolin 7-O-(2-apiosyl)-glucoside and quercitrin constituted the major (poly)phenols in both extracts. Raw and griddled pepper (poly)phenolic extracts impaired cell proliferation and induced low levels of Fpg-sensitive sites, in a dose-dependent manner, even at a non-cytotoxic concentration. None of the concentrations tested induced DNA strand breaks or alkaline labile sites. Nor did they show significant genoprotection against the DNA damage induced by H

conclusionsGreen pepper (poly)phenols did not show genoprotection against oxidatively generated damage in HT-29 cells at simulated physiological concentrations, regardless of the application, or not, of a culinary treatment (griddling). Furthermore, high concentrations of (poly)phenolic extracts induced a slight pro-oxidant effect, even at a non-cytotoxic concentration.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCapsicumColorectal NeoplasmsDNA DamageAntioxidantsChromatography, LiquidDNAHT29 CellsHumansHydrogen PeroxidePhenolsPlant ExtractsTandem Mass SpectrometryAntioxidantsDNAHydrogen PeroxidePhenolsPlant ExtractsCookingDNA damageGastrointestinal digestionHT-29 cellsPepperPolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID32430553
OpenAlexW3026906072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.