ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020
[Occupational aspects of palmoplantar pustulosis : Discussion based on the evaluation of retrospective data].
Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Palmoplantar pustulosis: pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and treatment.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Its classification as a variant of psoriasis is controversial. Exogenous factors may affect PPP.
objectivesOccupational aspects of PPP based on a retrospective evaluation of patient data are discussed.
methodsData from 1518 patients who took part in a tertiary prevention program (TIP) for occupational skin diseases in our department between January 2015 and June 2019 were evaluated.
resultsPPP was diagnosed in 30 patients (1.98%). The hands were affected in all of them, while concomitant feet involvement was found in 83.3%. The majority was female (70.0%) and reported tobacco smoking (83.3%). Systemic treatment was continued or initiated in one third of patients. In only 8 patients (26.7%) was PPP considered to be work-related.
conclusionsPPP is an endogenous disease which is influenced by nonoccupational factors (e.g., tobacco smoking). Therefore, a thorough investigation is mandatory when assessing whether occupational factors are legally essential and exceed aggravation by everyday life. For this purpose, a well-documented course of the disease and a critical appraisal of occupational and nonoccupational factors are crucial. Only if occupational causality is probable can preventive measures be provided by the statutory accident insurance and PPP can be legally recognized as an occupational disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32430542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.