ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Cardiac Progenitor Differentiation.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the transcriptional heterogeneity of Tbx18-positive cardiac cells during heart development.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in cancer: Applications, advances, and emerging challenges.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Review
- DAND5 Inactivation Enhances Cardiac Differentiation in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEmerging single-cell RNA sequencing technologies hold great promises to boost our understanding of the heterogeneity and molecular regulation of diverse cell phenotypes during organ development. In this review, we aimed at summarizing recent advances in employing single-cell transcriptomic analysis to depict the landscape of embryonic heart development, in particular, focusing on cardiac progenitor (CP) differentiation. RECENT
findingsRecent studies unbiasedly cataloged and characterized cardiac cell types in the spatial and temporal resolution during early heart development. Pseudo-time analysis revealed a temporal continuum of the differentiation progress from embryonic day (E) 6.5 to E9.5, implicating early cardiac lineage restriction during mouse gastrulation. First and second heart field (FHF and SHF) CPs adopted different differentiation strategies and underwent distinct transcriptional regulation. Collectively, the comprehensive molecular atlases yield a rich resource for identification of the key cardiac regulators and signaling molecules within the key cardiac gene regulatory network (GRN) governing cardiac cell fate determinations. This review offers insights into the exquisite process and its regulation of CP differentiation at single-cell resolution. As single-cell technologies continuously grow and evolve, computational integration of multimodal single-cell data with well-designed experimental validation promises to further delineate molecular basis in deploying cardiac progenitors of distinct sources with anatomical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.