Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430297›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Distinct Oscillatory Dynamics Underlie Different Components of Hierarchical Cognitive Control.

Justin Riddle, David A Vogelsang, Kai Hwang, Dillan Cellier, Mark D'Esposito

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Causal Evidence for Prefrontal-Motor Coupling in Reward-Responsive Goal-Directed Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prefrontal Hierarchical Control of Corticomuscular Coherence in Stroke.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Errors elicit frontoparietal theta-gamma coupling that is modulated by endogenous estradiol levels.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin RiddleDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-1650 riddler@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2251-3643
David A VogelsangHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3370.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-6025
Kai HwangHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3370.ORCID 0000-0002-1064-7815
Dillan CellierDepartment of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52245.ORCID 0000-0003-3807-7049
Mark D'EspositoDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-1650.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-006X
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Working Memory and Prefrontal CortexR01MH063901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Postdoctoral Training in Reproductive Mood DisordersT32MH093315 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN Scott GIRDLER, David R. Rubinow · 2012 to 2026
$2.8M
Neural dynamics of human working memory networksR01MH111737 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063901NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111737NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hierarchical cognitive control enables us to execute actions guided by abstract goals. Previous research has suggested that neuronal oscillations at different frequency bands are associated with top-down cognitive control; however, whether distinct neural oscillations have similar or different functions for cognitive control is not well understood. The aim of the current study was to investigate the oscillatory neuronal mechanisms underlying two distinct components of hierarchical cognitive control: the level of abstraction of a rule, and the number of rules that must be maintained (set-size). We collected EEG data in 31 men and women who performed a hierarchical cognitive control task that varied in levels of abstraction and set-size. Results from time-frequency analysis in frontal electrodes showed an increase in theta amplitude for increased set-size, whereas an increase in δ was associated with increased abstraction. Both theta and δ amplitude correlated with behavioral performance in the tasks but in an opposite manner: theta correlated with response time slowing when the number of rules increased, whereas δ correlated with response time when rules became more abstract. Phase-amplitude coupling analysis revealed that δ phase-coupled with β amplitude during conditions with a higher level of abstraction, whereby beta band may potentially represent motor output that was guided by the δ phase. These results suggest that distinct neural oscillatory mechanisms underlie different components of hierarchical cognitive control.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultabstractioncognitive controlEEGphase-amplitude couplingset-sizetime frequency

Identifiers

PMID32430297
PMCPMC7326361
OpenAlexW3027016426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.