Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430033›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2020

γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not.

Christian B Lessard, Edgardo Rodriguez, Thomas B Ladd, Lisa M Minter, Barbara A Osborne, Lucio Miele, Todd E Golde, Yong Ran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Discovery of a novel regulator, 3β-sulfate-5-cholestenoic acid, of lipid metabolism and inflammation.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian B LessardDepartment of Neuroscience and Neurology, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, PO Box 100159, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Edgardo RodriguezDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Thomas B LaddDepartment of Neuroscience and Neurology, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, PO Box 100159, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Lisa M MinterDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Center for Bioactive Delivery, Institute for Applied Life Sciences, and Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Barbara A OsborneDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Center for Bioactive Delivery, Institute for Applied Life Sciences, and Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Lucio MieleDepartment of Genetics and Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Todd E GoldeDepartment of Neuroscience and Neurology, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, PO Box 100159, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. tgolde@ufl.edu.
Yong RanDepartment of Neuroscience and Neurology, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, PO Box 100159, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. yran@ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9748-4392
University of Florida · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940NIH HHS P01-CA166009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundγ-Secretase is a multiprotein protease that cleaves amyloid protein precursor (APP) and other type I transmembrane proteins. It has two catalytic subunits, presenilins 1 and 2 (PS1 and 2). In our previous report, we observed subtle differences in PS1- and PS2-mediated cleavages of select substrates and slightly different potencies of PS1 versus PS2 inhibition for select γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) on various substrates. In this study, we investigated whether γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) and inverse γ-secretase modulators (iGSMs) modulate γ-secretase processivity using multiple different substrates. We next used HEK 293T cell lines in which PSEN1 or PSEN2 was selectively knocked out to investigate processivity and response to GSMs and iGSMs.

methodsFor cell-free γ-secretase cleavage assay, recombinant substrates were incubated with CHAPSO-solubilized CHO or HEK 293T cell membrane with GSMs or iGSMs in suitable buffer. For cell-based assay, cDNA encoding substrates were transfected into HEK 293T cells. Cells were then treated with GSMs or iGSMs, and conditioned media were collected. Aβ and Aβ-like peptide production from cell-free and cell-based assay were measured by ELISA and mass spectrometry.

resultThese studies demonstrated that GSMs are highly selective for effects on APP, whereas iGSMs have a more promiscuous effect on many substrates. Surprisingly, iGSMs actually appear to act as like GSIs on select substrates. The data with PSEN1 or PSEN2 knocked out HEK 293T reveal that PS1 has higher processivity and response to GSMs than PS2, but PS2 has higher response to iGSM.

conclusionCollectively, these data indicate that GSMs are likely to have limited target-based toxicity. In addition, they show that iGSMs may act as substrate-selective GSIs providing a potential new route to identify leads for substrate-selective inhibitors of certain γ-secretase-mediated signaling events. With growing concerns that long-term β-secretase inhibitor is limited by target-based toxicities, such data supports continued development of GSMs as AD prophylactics.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAmyloid beta-PeptidesHEK293 CellsHumansPresenilin-2Signal TransductionAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesPresenilin-2Alzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid peptideAmyloid protein precursor (APP)CancerGene knockoutNOTCHPresenilinVEGFR1γ-Secretase modulators (GSMs)

Identifiers

PMID32430033
PMCPMC7236921
OpenAlexW3026790003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.