Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32430032›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Postnatal home visits by health extension workers in rural areas of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.

Yemane Berhane Tesfau, Alemayehu Bayray Kahsay, Tesfay Gebregzabher Gebrehiwot, Araya Abrha Medhanyie, Hagos Godefay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yemane Berhane TesfauCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia. yemaneberhane12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9146-5940
Alemayehu Bayray KahsayMekelle University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Tesfay Gebregzabher GebrehiwotMekelle University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Araya Abrha MedhanyieMekelle University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Hagos GodefayTigray Regional Health Bureau, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Mekelle University · ETAdigrat University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low-income countries like Ethiopia, where families have poor access to or do not utilize the services of formal health care systems, community health workers provide postnatal care services through home visits. However, the extent and effectiveness of home-based postnatal visits by community health workers such as the Ethiopian health extension workers (HEWs) are not well explored. This community -based study aimed to determine the coverage, contents of postnatal home visits and associated factors by health extension workers in Northern Ethiopia.

methodsWe conducted a community based cross-sectional study in the rural Districts in Northern Ethiopia from August to September 2018. A total of 705 mothers who gave a live birth in the year preceding the survey were selected using multistage random sampling. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect data by interviewing the mothers. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 statistical software. Association of postnatal home visits with possible explanatory variables was investigated using logistic regression.

resultsOne hundred and two (14.5%) mothers and newborns received PNC home visit within three days after birth from HEW and 170(24.1%) reported postnatal home visits within 42 days. Among the mothers who received postnatal home visits, 6.5% measured their blood pressure, 11.2% measured their temperature, 20% counseled about family planning, 16.5% counseled on newborn danger signs, 11.2% counseled on the skin to skincare of the newborn and 14.1% of their newborns were measured their weight at home. Mothers who received at least one home visit during pregnancy (AOR, 7.49; CI 3.55-15.80), participated in pregnant women forum (AOR, 3.16; CI 1.67-5.99), notified their birth (AOR, 6.16; CI 3.50-10.84) and those members of community health insurance (AOR, 1.87; CI 1.13-3.10) were factors associated with postnatal home visit by a health extension worker.

conclusionThe coverage of postnatal home visits by health extension workers remains low in rural districts of Northern Ethiopia. The existing health systems should consider interventions that improve pregnancy and birth notification strategies and more efforts should be made at improving community-based participation and linkages with community health workers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommunity Health WorkersCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHouse CallsHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHealth extension workersNorthern EthiopiaPostnatal home visitsRural districts

Identifiers

PMID32430032
PMCPMC7236285
OpenAlexW3028334655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.