Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429987›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study.

Marie Ferrua, Etienne Minvielle, Aude Fourcade, Benoît Lalloué, Claude Sicotte, Mario Di Palma, Olivier Mir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05500391 (Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Compliance With Monitoring Conducted Either by a Hospital-based Physician in Person or by a Nurse in Remote Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05500391 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Compliance With Monitoring Conducted Either by a Hospital-based Physician in Person or by a Nurse in Remote Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2024 to 2032Enrolled88ConditionsStage I Testicular Seminoma, Stage I Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Ovarian Germ Cell TumorArmsOncological Follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nurse navigators' telemonitoring for cancer patients with COVID-19: a French case study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marie FerruaCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. marie.ferrua@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-6038
Etienne MinvielleCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Aude FourcadeCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Benoît LallouéLorraine University, CNRS, Inria, Nancy, France.
Claude SicotteCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Mario Di PalmaCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Olivier MirCapri program, Research Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRHôpital américain de paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) based on e-health, Nurse Navigators (NNs) and patient engagement can improve patient follow-up and have a positive impact on quality of care (by limiting adverse events) and costs (by reducing readmissions). However, the extent of this impact depends on effective implementation which is often restricted. This is partly due to the lack of attention paid to the RPMS design phase prior to implementation. The content of the RPMS can be carefully designed at this stage and various obstacles anticipated. Our aim was to report on an RPMS design case to provide insights into the methodology required in order to manage this phase.

methodsThis study was carried out at Gustave Roussy, a comprehensive cancer centre, in France. A multidisciplinary team coordinated the CAPRI RPMS design process (2013-2015) that later produced positive outcomes. Data were collected during eight studies conducted according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. This project was approved by the French National Data Protection Authorities.

resultsBased on the study results, the multidisciplinary team defined strategies for resolving obstacles prior to the implementation of CAPRI. Consequently, the final CAPRI design includes a web app with two interfaces (patient and health care professionals) and two NNs. The NNs provide regular follow-up via telephone or email to manage patients' symptoms and toxicity, treatment compliance and care packages. Patients contact the NNs via a secure messaging system. Eighty clinical decision support tools enable NNs to prioritise and decide on the course of action to be taken.

conclusionIn our experience, the RPMS design process and, more generally, that of any complex intervention programme, is an important phase that requires a sound methodological basis. This study is also consistent with the notion that an RPMS is more than a technological innovation. This is indeed an organizational innovation, and principles identified during the design phase can help in the effective use of a RPMS (e.g. locating NNs if possible within the care organization; recruiting NNs with clinical and managerial skills; defining algorithms for clinical decision support tools for assessment, but also for patient decision and orientation).

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationDecision MakingFranceHealth PersonnelHumansTelemedicineCare coordinationComplex interventionImplementationOncologyRemote Patient Monitoring system

Identifiers

PMID32429987
PMCPMC7236289
OpenAlexW3027840689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.