Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429973›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2020

Research priorities for rehabilitation and aging with HIV: a framework from the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative (CIHRRC).

Kelly K O'Brien, Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco, Patricia Solomon, Richard Harding, Darren Brown, Puja Ahluwalia, Soo Chan Carusone, Larry Baxter, Charles Emlet, Gayle Restall and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelly K O'BrienDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Room 160, Toronto, ON, Canada. kelly.obrien@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-6537
Francisco Ibáñez-CarrascoCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patricia SolomonSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Room 403, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, UK.
Darren BrownTherapies Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-243X
Puja AhluwaliaRealize, 600 Bay Street, Suite 600, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Soo Chan CarusoneCasey House, 119 Isabella Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Larry Baxter, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Charles EmletUniversity of Washington, Tacoma, Social Work, 1900 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Gayle RestallCollege of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, R127 Rehab Building, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alan CaseyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Amrita AhluwaliaFife House, 490 Sherbourne Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adria QuigleyFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, 5968 College Street, Room 316, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Alex R TerpstraDepartment of Psychology, 2136 West Mall, Room 2405, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nkem OnoniwuDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Room 160, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACanadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society · CACasey House · CAChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBDalhousie University · CAFife House · CAKing's College London · GBMcMaster University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Washington Tacoma · US

Funding

CIHR FRN#142085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with HIV are living longer, and can experience physical, mental and social health challenges associated with aging and multimorbidity. Rehabilitation is well positioned to address disability and maximize healthy aging. An international collaborative network, called the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative (CIHRRC), works to guide this emerging field. In this article, we report findings from CIHRRC's aim to identify emerging research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation from the perspectives of people living with HIV, clinicians, researchers, representatives from community organizations and policy stakeholders.

methodsWe conducted a multi-stakeholder multi-method international consultation with people living with HIV, researchers, clinicians and representatives of community-based organizations to identify research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation. Stakeholders identified research priorities during a one-day International Forum comprised of presentations and facilitated discussion. We collated and analyzed data using content analytical techniques, resulting in a framework of research priorities.

resultsSixty-nine stakeholders from countries including Canada (n = 62; 90%), the United Kingdom (n = 5; 7%), United States (n = 1; 1%) and Australia (n = 1; 1%) attended the International Forum on HIV, Aging and Rehabilitation Research. Stakeholders represented community-based organizations (n = 20; 29%), academic institutions (n = 18; 26%), community or institutional healthcare organizations (n = 11; 16%), research or knowledge production organizations (n = 10; 14%), and organizations representing government or industry (n = 10; 14%). The Framework of Research Priorities in HIV, Aging and Rehabilitation includes seven research priorities: (1) nature, extent and impact of disability, concurrent health conditions and chronic inflammation with HIV; (2) prevalence, severity and impact of frailty; (3) community and social participation aging with HIV; (4) strategies for chronic disease management and healthy aging with HIV; (5) facilitators and barriers to access and engagement in, rehabilitation; (6) effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for healthy aging with HIV; and (7) advancing development and use of patient reported outcome measures in HIV and aging. The Framework highlights methodological considerations to approach the priorities and the importance of knowledge translation and exchange to apply research knowledge into practice, programs and policy.

conclusionsThese priorities offer a foundation for collaboration among international and multidisciplinary teams to advance the field of HIV, aging and rehabilitation in order to promote healthy aging with HIV.

Indexed as

AgingCanadaChronic DiseaseCongresses as TopicHIV InfectionsHumansInternationalityRehabilitation ResearchResearchAgingDisabilityHIVRehabilitationResearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID32429973
PMCPMC7236512
OpenAlexW3026697815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.