Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429971›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Using virtual worlds as a platform for collaborative meetings in healthcare: a feasibility study.

Michael J Taylor, Chiya Shikaislami, Chris McNicholas, David Taylor, Julie Reed, Ivo Vlaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Virtual conference design: features and obstacles.Multimedia tools and applications · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J TaylorDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Chiya ShikaislamiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Chris McNicholasCLAHRC for North West London, CLAHRC offices, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
David TaylorDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Julie ReedCLAHRC for North West London, CLAHRC offices, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Ivo VlaevWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Scarman Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. ivo.vlaev@wbs.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-0144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare teams often consist of geographically dispersed members. Virtual worlds can support immersive, high-quality, multimedia interaction between remote individuals; this study investigated use of virtual worlds to support remote healthcare quality improvement team meetings.

methodsTwenty individuals (12 female, aged 25-67 [M = 42.3, SD = 11.8]) from 6 healthcare quality improvement teams conducted collaborative tasks in virtual world or face-to-face settings. Quality of collaborative task performances were measured and questionnaires and interviews were used to record participants' experiences of conducting the tasks and using the virtual world software.

resultsQuality of collaborative task outcomes was high in both face-to-face and virtual world settings. Participant interviews elicited advantages for using virtual worlds in healthcare settings, including the ability of the virtual environment to support tools that cannot be represented in equivalent face-to-face meetings, and the potential for virtual world settings to cause improvements in group-dynamics. Reported disadvantages for future virtual world use in healthcare included the difficulty that people with weaker computer skills may experience with using the software. Participants tended to feel absorbed in the collaborative task they conducted within the virtual world, but did not experience the virtual environment as being 'real'.

conclusionsVirtual worlds can provide an effective platform for collaborative meetings in healthcare quality improvement, but provision of support to those with weaker computer skills should be ensured, as should the technical reliability of the virtual world being used. Future research could investigate use of virtual worlds in other healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamUser-Computer InterfaceAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocial BehaviorSoftwareSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and AnalysisMDTMultidisciplinary team meetingQuality improvementVirtual worlds

Identifiers

PMID32429971
PMCPMC7236942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.