SynthesisBMC cancer2020
Prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNA expression in colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of circRNAs expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNA expression in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Circular RNA circSMARCA5 is a prognostic biomarker in patients with malignant tumor: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- The Emerging Role of Circular RNAs in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Pooled it
- Non-coding RNAs and gastrointestinal cancers prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Tailored Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- circ-ANXA7 facilitates lung adenocarcinoma progression via miR-331/LAD1 axis.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Prognostic and Diagnostic Significance of circRNA Expression in Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) are research hotspots in the network of noncoding RNAs in numerous tumours. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinicopathological, prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNAs in colorectal cancer.
methodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases were searched for relevant studies before May 15, 2019. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between circRNAs expression, and overall survival (OS) and clinical parameters. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the diagnostic value of circRNAs.
resultsA total of 19 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, with 11 on clinicopathological parameters, 8 on prognosis and 7 on diagnosis. For clinicopathological and prognostic value, elevated expression of oncogenic circRNAs was correlated with poor clinical parameters (tumor size: OR = 1.769, 95% CI: 1.097-2.852; differentiation grade: OR = 1.743, 95% CI: 1.032-2.946; TNM stage: OR = 3.320, 95% CI: 1.529-7.207; T classification: OR = 3.410, 95% CI: 2.088-5.567; lymph node metastasis: OR = 3.357, 95% CI: 2.160-5.215; distal metastasis: OR = 4.338, 95% CI: 2.503-7.520) and worse prognosis (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.50-3.52). However, elevated expression of tumor-suppressor circRNAs was correlated with better clinical parameters (differentiation grade: OR = 0.453, 95% CI: 0.261-0.787; T classification: OR = 0.553, 95% CI: 0.328-0.934; distal metastasis: OR = 0.196, 95% CI: 0.077-0.498) and favorable prognosis (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.64). For diagnostic value, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.88), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85), respectively.
conclusionsThese results indicate that circRNAs may be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.