Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429927›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2020

Statin use and lung cancer risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a population-based cohort study.

Ajn Raymakers, D D Sin, M Sadatsafavi, J M FitzGerald, C A Marra, L D Lynd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COPD-Lung Cancer Comorbidity: Mechanistic Insights and Precision Oncology Implications.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Fully integrating pathophysiological insights in COPD: an updated working disease model to broaden therapeutic vision.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ajn RaymakersCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada.
D D SinCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
M SadatsafaviCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada.
J M FitzGeraldDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
C A MarraSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
L D LyndCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada. larry.lynd@ubc.ca.
University of British Columbia · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CAUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

CIHR MOP-89865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at an increased risk of lung cancer. A common comorbidity of COPD is cardiovascular disease; as such, COPD patients often receive statins. This study sought to understand the association between statin exposure and lung cancer risk in a population-based cohort of COPD patients.

methodsWe identified a population-based cohort of COPD patients based on having filled at least three prescriptions for an anticholinergic or short-acting beta-agonist (SABA). We used an array of methods of defining medication exposure including three conventional methods (ever statin exposure, cumulative duration of use, and cumulative dose) and two novel methods (recency-weighted cumulative duration of use and recency-weighted cumulative dose). To assess residual confounding, a negative control exposure was used to test the validity of our results. All exposure variables were time-dependent.

resultsThe population-based cohort of COPD had 39,879 patients with mean age of 70.6 (SD: 11.2) years and, of which, 53.5% were female. There were 12,469 patients who received at least one statin prescription. Results from the reference case multivariable analysis indicated a reduced risk from statin exposure (HR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-1.00) in COPD patients, but this result not statistically significant. Using the two recency-weighted modelling approaches, statin exposure was associated with a statistically significant reduction in lung cancer risk (recency-weighted cumulative dose, HR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.93) and recency-weighted cumulative duration of use, HR: 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). Multivariable analysis incorporating the negative control exposure was not statistically significant (HR: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75-1.10).

conclusionsThe results of this population-based analysis indicate that statin use in COPD patients may reduce the risk of lung cancer. While the effect was not statistically significantly across all exposure definitions, the overall results support the hypothesis that COPD patients might benefit from statin therapy.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAgedAged, 80 and overBritish ColumbiaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRegistriesRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdministrative dataEpidemiologyHealth services researchPharmacoepidemiologyReal-world dataStatins

Identifiers

PMID32429927
PMCPMC7236956
OpenAlexW3027686422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.