Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429903›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Improving the effectiveness of point of care tests for malaria and anaemia: a qualitative study across three Ghanaian antenatal clinics.

Tanith Palmer, Abiola O Aiyenigba, Imelda Bates, Doris Dokua Okyere, Harry Tagbor, Gifty Dufie Ampofo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanith PalmerLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembrooke Place, Liverpool, L3 5AQ, UK. Tanith_Palmer@sandwell.gov.uk.
Abiola O AiyenigbaLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembrooke Place, Liverpool, L3 5AQ, UK.
Imelda BatesLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembrooke Place, Liverpool, L3 5AQ, UK.
Doris Dokua OkyereSchool of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, PMB 31, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Harry TagborSchool of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, PMB 31, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Gifty Dufie AmpofoSchool of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, PMB 31, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaemia and malaria are both major contributors to maternal and child mortality, and morbidity, with some of the worst outcomes occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Point of care tests (POCT), if used appropriately, provide a simple, inexpensive form of diagnostic testing, as a reliable alternative when laboratory tests are not readily available. In such resource limited settings, clinical staff tend to rely on symptom-based diagnosis and presumptive treatment. This study uses qualitative methods to identify the current practice of POCT use for malaria and anaemia, to explore the enablers and barriers to effective implementation of these POCT, and to determine how relationships between each of the stakeholder groups may impact on POCT use.

methodsStaff (clinical and laboratory) and patients (pregnant women) at three antenatal care facilities within the Ashanti Region of Ghana participated in interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). An initial coding framework was developed based on the pre-defined objectives of the study. Thematic analysis was used to identify subthemes and categories within each of the key themes.

resultsAt the time data were collected all three facilities used malaria POCT either as an adjunct to microscopy, or as their only form of malaria testing. Although all three facilities were familiar with haemoglobin colour scale (HCS), none of the facilities used them routinely. Clinical staff perceived symptom-based diagnosis was a quick way to diagnosis because access to POCT during consultations was unreliable, but recognized disadvantages associated with symptom-based diagnosis. Perceived advantages of malaria and anaemia POCT were user-friendliness, improved diagnosis and opportunity for patient engagement, as well as lower cost implication for patients. Perceived disadvantages included likelihood of missed diagnosis of mild anaemia, as well as likelihood of human error leading to in accurate diagnosis which could impact on patient trust. Poor communication and lack of trust between staff groups was also identified as a barrier to effective uptake of POCT.

conclusionsConsistent supply of POCT as well as staff training and staff and patient engagement, are fundamental to successful uptake of POCT for effective malaria and anaemia management.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnemiaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHemoglobinsHumansMalariaPoint-of-Care SystemsPregnancyPregnant PeopleHemoglobinsActive participationAntenatal careGhanaHaemoglobin colour scaleLMICMalaria and anaemia in pregnancyRapid diagnostic test

Identifiers

PMID32429903
PMCPMC7238731
OpenAlexW3028268400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.