ArticleBMC genomics2020
Transposable element persistence via potential genome-level ecosystem engineering.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Study of Transposable Elements: Structural Characterization and Phylogenomic Profiling in Plant Genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- Transposon Ecology and the Octopus Genome.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Characterizing the ecological niche of insertion sequences within prokaryotic genomes.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Do duplication-inducing elements 'cooperate' with genes in evolutionary arms races? A case study on cereal crop pathogenesis.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Whole genome regulatory effect ofmBio · 2024Article
- All families of transposable elements were active in the recent wheat genome evolution and polyploidy had no impact on their activity.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Intracellular common gardens reveal niche differentiation in transposable element community during bacterial adaptive evolution.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Diverse and mobile: eccDNA-based identification of carrot low-copy-number LTR retrotransposons active in callus cultures.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Engines of change: Transposable element mutation rates are high and variable within Daphnia magna.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- The genomic ecosystem of transposable elements in maize.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Long-term TE persistence even without beneficial insertion.BMC genomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe nuclear genomes of eukaryotes vary enormously in size, with much of this variability attributable to differential accumulation of transposable elements (TEs). To date, the precise evolutionary and ecological conditions influencing TE accumulation remain poorly understood. Most previous attempts to identify these conditions have focused on evolutionary processes occurring at the host organism level, whereas we explore a TE ecology explanation.
resultsAs an alternative (or additional) hypothesis, we propose that ecological mechanisms occurring within the host cell may contribute to patterns of TE accumulation. To test this idea, we conducted a series of experiments using a simulated asexual TE/host system. Each experiment tracked the accumulation rate for a given type of TE within a particular host genome. TEs in this system had a net deleterious effect on host fitness, which did not change over the course of experiments. As one might expect, in the majority of experiments TEs were either purged from the genome or drove the host population to extinction. However, in an intriguing handful of cases, TEs co-existed with hosts and accumulated to very large numbers. This tended to occur when TEs achieved a stable density relative to non-TE sequences in the genome (as opposed to reaching any particular absolute number). In our model, the only way to maintain a stable density was for TEs to generate new, inactive copies at a rate that balanced with the production of active (replicating) copies.
conclusionsFrom a TE ecology perspective, we suggest this could be interpreted as a case of ecosystem engineering within the genome, where TEs persist by creating their own "habitat".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.