Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429843›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Transposable element persistence via potential genome-level ecosystem engineering.

Stefan C Kremer, Stefan Linquist, Brent Saylor, Tyler A Elliott, T Ryan Gregory, Karl Cottenie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Transposon Ecology and the Octopus Genome.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan C KremerSchool of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. skremer@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-4379
Stefan LinquistDepartment of Philosophy, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Brent SaylorDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Tyler A ElliottCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
T Ryan GregoryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Karl CottenieDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Funding

National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nuclear genomes of eukaryotes vary enormously in size, with much of this variability attributable to differential accumulation of transposable elements (TEs). To date, the precise evolutionary and ecological conditions influencing TE accumulation remain poorly understood. Most previous attempts to identify these conditions have focused on evolutionary processes occurring at the host organism level, whereas we explore a TE ecology explanation.

resultsAs an alternative (or additional) hypothesis, we propose that ecological mechanisms occurring within the host cell may contribute to patterns of TE accumulation. To test this idea, we conducted a series of experiments using a simulated asexual TE/host system. Each experiment tracked the accumulation rate for a given type of TE within a particular host genome. TEs in this system had a net deleterious effect on host fitness, which did not change over the course of experiments. As one might expect, in the majority of experiments TEs were either purged from the genome or drove the host population to extinction. However, in an intriguing handful of cases, TEs co-existed with hosts and accumulated to very large numbers. This tended to occur when TEs achieved a stable density relative to non-TE sequences in the genome (as opposed to reaching any particular absolute number). In our model, the only way to maintain a stable density was for TEs to generate new, inactive copies at a rate that balanced with the production of active (replicating) copies.

conclusionsFrom a TE ecology perspective, we suggest this could be interpreted as a case of ecosystem engineering within the genome, where TEs persist by creating their own "habitat".

Indexed as

EcosystemGenomeModels, GeneticBiological CoevolutionDNA Transposable ElementsEukaryotaEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessGenomic InstabilityDNA Transposable ElementsC-value paradoxEcosystem engineeringGenome-level ecologyJunk DNATransposon accumulationTransposon ecology

Identifiers

PMID32429843
PMCPMC7236351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.