ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020
Hybrid foraging in patchy environments using spatial memory.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lévy movements and a slowly decaying memory allow efficient collective learning in groups of interacting foragers.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Assessing Team Effectiveness by How Players Structure Their Search in a First-Person Multiplayer Video Game.Cognitive science · 2022Article
- Foraging behaviour and patch size distribution jointly determine population dynamics in fragmented landscapes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- The evolutionary maintenance of Lévy flight foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Synthetic Spatial Foraging With Active Inference in a Geocaching Task.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Intrinsic and environmental factors modulating autonomous robotic search under high uncertainty.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Differential equation model for central-place foragers with memory: implications for bumble bee crop pollination.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Balancing Collective Exploration and Exploitation in Multi-Agent and Multi-Robot Systems: A Review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient random searches are essential to the survival of foragers searching for sparsely distributed targets. Lévy walks have been found to optimize the search over a wide range of constraints. When targets are distributed within patches, generating a spatial memory over the detected targets can be beneficial towards optimizing the search efficiency. Because foragers have limited memory, storing each target location separately is unrealistic. Instead, we propose incrementally learning a spatial distribution in favour of memorizing target locations. We demonstrate that an ensemble of Gaussian mixture models is a suitable candidate for such a spatial distribution. Using this, a hybrid foraging strategy is proposed, which interchanges random searches with informed movement. Informed movement results in displacements towards target locations, and is more likely to occur if the learned spatial distribution is correct. We show that, depending on the strength of the memory effects, foragers optimize search efficiencies by continuous revisitation of non-destructive targets. However, this negatively affects both the target and patch diversity, indicating that memory does not necessarily optimize multi-objective searches. Hence, the benefits of memory depend on the specific goals of the forager. Furthermore, through analysis of the distribution over walking distances of the forager, we show that memory changes the underlying walk characteristics. Specifically, the forager resorts to Brownian motion instead of Lévy walks, due to truncation of the long straight line displacements resulting from memory effects. This study provides a framework that opens up new avenues for investigating memory effects on foraging in sparse environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.