Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429765›Full record

ArticleAnnals of human biology2020

Assessing data linkage quality in cohort studies.

Katie Harron, James C Doidge, Harvey Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of human biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. False Discovery Estimation in Record Linkage.Statistics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of Population-Level Administrative Data in Developmental Science.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Creating a Real-World Linked Research Platform for Analyzing the Urgent and Emergency Care System.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie HarronDepartment of Population, Practice and Policy, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-2856
James C DoidgeIntensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
Harvey GoldsteinDepartment of Population, Practice and Policy, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesData AccuracyHumansInformation Storage and Retrievaladministrative dataCohort studiesdata linkagemeasurement errorselection bias

Identifiers

PMID32429765
PMCPMC7261400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.