Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429455›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Local Government Competition and Regional Green Development in China: The Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation.

Na Zhang, Jinqian Deng, Fayyaz Ahmad, Muhammad Umar Draz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is environmental regulation effective in promoting the quantity and quality of green innovation?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Opening the Black Box: The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Technological Innovation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Na ZhangSchool of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-2578
Jinqian DengSchool of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6534-5614
Fayyaz AhmadSchool of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-0817
Muhammad Umar DrazIndependent Researcher, Scarborough, ON M1L 4P2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-3136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green development is an important way to meet the challenges of ecological and environmental protection and economic growth, as well as an inevitable choice to realize China's sustainable development in the new era. The Chinese economic system is such that local government competition has become a key factor affecting regional green development under the current leadership. Based on the inter-provincial panel data of 30 provinces in mainland China from 1997 to 2017, this paper uses the total-factor non-radial directional distance function and slack-based measure data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) to measure the green development efficiency of the provinces. Additionally, it also uses the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) index to decompose green development efficiency and analyzes its internal driving factors. Finally, taking environmental regulation as a mediating variable, this paper empirically analyzes the influence mechanism of local government competition on green development efficiency from three perspectives including growth competition, fiscal competition and investment competition. The study found that: the green development efficiency of Chinese regions showed a downward trend, with significant regional differences; technological progress is the key factor to improve the efficiency of green development, and its role gradually decreases from eastern to western and central regions; pure technical efficiency has become a bottleneck restricting the improvement of green development efficiency, while scale efficiency shows significant regional differences; the growth competition, fiscal competition and investment competition of local government all have a significant inhibitory effect on the efficiency of green development. This paper puts forward policy suggestions supporting enterprise technology research and development, optimizing energy conservation and emission reduction as well as improving the local government performance evaluation system for green development.

Indexed as

Environmental PolicyLocal GovernmentSustainable DevelopmentChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEconomic DevelopmentEfficiencyChinaenvironmental regulationgreen development efficiencylocal government competitionSBM-DEA

Identifiers

PMID32429455
PMCPMC7277232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.