Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429287›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2020

Metabolomics and Multi-Omics Integration: A Survey of Computational Methods and Resources.

Tara Eicher, Garrett Kinnebrew, Andrew Patt, Kyle Spencer, Kevin Ying, Qin Ma, Raghu Machiraju, And Ewy A Mathé

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tara EicherBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Garrett KinnebrewBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Andrew PattDivision of Preclinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, 9800 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD, 20892, USA.
Kyle SpencerBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kevin YingComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Qin MaBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Raghu MachirajuBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
And Ewy A MathéBiomedical Informatics Department, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As researchers are increasingly able to collect data on a large scale from multiple clinical and omics modalities, multi-omics integration is becoming a critical component of metabolomics research. This introduces a need for increased understanding by the metabolomics researcher of computational and statistical analysis methods relevant to multi-omics studies. In this review, we discuss common types of analyses performed in multi-omics studies and the computational and statistical methods that can be used for each type of analysis. We pinpoint the caveats and considerations for analysis methods, including required parameters, sample size and data distribution requirements, sources of a priori knowledge, and techniques for the evaluation of model accuracy. Finally, for the types of analyses discussed, we provide examples of the applications of corresponding methods to clinical and basic research. We intend that our review may be used as a guide for metabolomics researchers to choose effective techniques for multi-omics analyses relevant to their field of study.

Indexed as

biological pathwaysclusteringco-regulationdeep learningdimensionality reductionmachine learningmulti-omics integrationnetwork analysispathway enrichmentvisualization

Identifiers

PMID32429287
PMCPMC7281435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.