Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429233›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Multi-Modal PET and MR Imaging in the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Model for Initial

Gordon Winter, Andrea B F Koch, Jessica Löffler, Mika Lindén, Christoph Solbach, Alireza Abaei, Hao Li, Gerhard Glatting, Ambros J Beer, Volker Rasche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a novelQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Modified Quadrature Birdcage Coil Incorporated With a Curved Feature forIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experimental Nuclear Medicine Meets Tumor Biology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gordon WinterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-8057
Andrea B F KochDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Jessica LöfflerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Mika LindénDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry II, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Christoph SolbachDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Alireza AbaeiCore Facility Small Animal Imaging, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Hao LiCore Facility Small Animal Imaging, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Gerhard GlattingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Ambros J BeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Volker RascheCore Facility Small Animal Imaging, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1279Horizon 2020 667192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validation of novel target-specific radioligands requires animal experiments mostly using mice with xenografts. A pre-selection based on a simpler in vivo model would allow to reduce the number of animal experiments, in accordance with the 3Rs principles (reduction, replacement, refinement). In this respect, the chick embryo or hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) model is of special interest, as it is not considered an animal until day 17. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of quantitative analysis of target-specific radiotracer accumulation in xenografts using the HET-CAM model and combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For proof-of-principle we used established prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive and PSMA-negative prostate cancer xenografts and the clinically widely used PSMA-specific PET-tracer [

Indexed as

chick embryoHET-CAMMRImulti-modal imagingPETPSMA

Identifiers

PMID32429233
PMCPMC7281765
OpenAlexW3025357041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.