Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429101›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Use of Saliva for Diagnosis and Monitoring the SARS-CoV-2: A General Perspective.

Jose J Ceron, Elsa Lamy, Silvia Martinez-Subiela, Pia Lopez-Jornet, Fernando Capela E Silva, Peter David Eckersall, Asta Tvarijonaviciute

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04716543 (One-health Approach in Epidemiological Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in Laos), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04716543 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

One-health Approach in Epidemiological Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in Laos

TypeobservationalSponsorANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled5,400ConditionsInfluenza -Like Illness, Covid19ArmsILI and COVID-19 detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jose J CeronInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, Interlab-UMU, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Elsa LamyMediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development (MED), Advanced Research and Training Institute (IIFA), University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Silvia Martinez-SubielaInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, Interlab-UMU, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Pia Lopez-JornetDepartment Stomatology School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB-Arrixaca), Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Murcia, 30008 Adv Marques de los Velez s/n, Spain.
Fernando Capela E SilvaDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences and Technology. Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development (MED). University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Peter David EckersallInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Rd, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.
Asta TvarijonaviciuteInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, Interlab-UMU, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Fundación Séneca grant 19894/GERM/15Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Ramon y Cajal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this report, updated information and future perspectives about the use of saliva as a sample for laboratory analysis of the Covid-19 are highlighted. Saliva can be used for the direct detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the quantification of the specific immunoglobulins produced against it, and for the evaluation of the non-specific, innate immune response of the patient. Moreover, a deeper knowledge of potential changes in the saliva proteome in this disease may allow the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, or even help our understanding of the mechanisms associated with the disease. With the development of appropriate sample collection and processing methods and the use of adequate assays, saliva can provide useful clinical information about the disease and could be potentially included in guidelines for sample collection for the diagnosis, disease management, and control of Covid-19.

Indexed as

coronavirusCovid-19salivaSARS

Identifiers

PMID32429101
PMCPMC7290439
OpenAlexW3024803619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.