Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32429085›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Immersive Virtual Reality in Stroke Patients as a New Approach for Reducing Postural Disabilities and Falls Risk: A Case Series.

Irene Cortés-Pérez, Francisco Antonio Nieto-Escamez, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06274281 (Implementing a Digital Telerehabilitation Protocol and Non-motor Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Patients With Functional Motor Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06274281 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Digital Telerehabilitation Protocol and Non-motor Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Patients With Functional Motor Disorders: a Feasibility 2-arm Parallel Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversita di VeronaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsFunctional Movement DisorderArmsDigital Telerehabilitation, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Cortés-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Paraje Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
Francisco Antonio Nieto-EscamezDepartment of Psychology, University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, 04120 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5301-9475
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Paraje Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-5500
Universidad de Jaén · ESUniversity of Almería · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidad FPU17/01619NeuroDigital Technologies SL OTR2018/111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a neurologic disorder considered the first cause of disability worldwide due to motor, cognitive, and sensorial sequels. Balance dysfunctions in stroke survivors increase the risk of falls and physiotherapeutic rehabilitation is essential to reduce it. Virtual reality (VR) seems to be an alternative to conventional physiotherapy (CT), providing virtual environments and multisensorial inputs to train balance in stroke patients. The aim of this study was to assess if immersive VR treatment is more effective than CT to improve balance after stroke. This study got the approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Almeria. Three chronic ischemic stroke patients were selected. One patient who received 25 sessions of immersive VR intervention for two months was compared with another patient who received equivalent CT and a third patient with no intervention. Balance, gait, risk of falling, and vestibular and visual implications in the equilibrium were assessed. After the interventions, the two patients receiving any of the treatments showed an improvement in balance compared to the untreated patient. In comparison to CT, our results suggest a higher effect of immersive VR in the improvement of balance and a reduction of falls risk due to the active upright work during the VR intervention.

Indexed as

balanceconventional physiotherapyfalls riskgaitimmersive virtual realitystroke

Identifiers

PMID32429085
PMCPMC7287864
OpenAlexW3025518397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.