Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32428891›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

C-arm orbits for metal artifact avoidance (MAA) in cone-beam CT.

P Wu, N Sheth, A Sisniega, A Uneri, R Han, R Vijayan, P Vagdargi, B Kreher, H Kunze, G Kleinszig and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parametric-MAA: fast, object-centric avoidance of metal artifacts for intraoperative CBCT.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spectral Orbits: Combining Spectral Imaging and Non-Circular Orbits for Interventional CBCT.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Universal orbit design for metal artifact elimination.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

P WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-3043
N ShethDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A SisniegaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-1805
R HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
R VijayanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-0783
P VagdargiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
B KreherSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
H KunzeSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-2370
G KleinszigSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
S VogtSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
S-F LoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Traylor Building Room 622, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
N TheodoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Traylor Building Room 622, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
J H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Funding

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal artifacts present a challenge to cone-beam CT (CBCT) image-guided surgery, obscuring visualization of metal instruments and adjacent anatomy-often in the very region of interest pertinent to the imaging/surgical tasks. We present a method to reduce the influence of metal artifacts by prospectively defining an image acquisition protocol-viz., the C-arm source-detector orbit-that mitigates metal-induced biases in the projection data. The metal artifact avoidance (MAA) method is compatible with simple mobile C-arms, does not require exact prior information on the patient or metal implants, and is consistent with 3D filtered backprojection (FBP), more advanced (e.g. polyenergetic) model-based image reconstruction (MBIR), and metal artifact reduction (MAR) post-processing methods. The MAA method consists of: (i) coarse localization of metal objects in the field-of-view (FOV) via two or more low-dose scout projection views and segmentation (e.g. a simple U-Net) in coarse backprojection; (ii) model-based prediction of metal-induced x-ray spectral shift for all source-detector vertices accessible by the imaging system (e.g. gantry rotation and tilt angles); and (iii) identification of a circular or non-circular orbit that reduces the variation in spectral shift. The method was developed, tested, and evaluated in a series of studies presenting increasing levels of complexity and realism, including digital simulations, phantom experiment, and cadaver experiment in the context of image-guided spine surgery (pedicle screw implants). The MAA method accurately predicted tilted circular and non-circular orbits that reduced the magnitude of metal artifacts in CBCT reconstructions. Realistic distributions of metal instrumentation were successfully localized (0.71 median Dice coefficient) from 2-6 low-dose scout views even in complex anatomical scenes. The MAA-predicted tilted circular orbits reduced root-mean-square error (RMSE) in 3D image reconstructions by 46%-70% and 'blooming' artifacts (apparent width of the screw shaft) by 20-45%. Non-circular orbits defined by MAA achieved a further ∼46% reduction in RMSE compared to the best (tilted) circular orbit. The MAA method presents a practical means to predict C-arm orbits that minimize spectral bias from metal instrumentation. Resulting orbits-either simple tilted circular orbits or more complex non-circular orbits that can be executed with a motorized multi-axis C-arm-exhibited substantial reduction of metal artifacts in raw CBCT reconstructions by virtue of higher fidelity projection data, which are in turn compatible with subsequent MAR post-processing and/or polyenergetic MBIR to further reduce artifacts.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingAlgorithmsArtifactsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMetalsPedicle ScrewsSpineSurgery, Computer-AssistedMetals

Identifiers

PMID32428891
PMCPMC8650760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.