ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Characterization of a new scintillation imaging system for proton pencil beam dose rate measurements.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using hydrated electron temporal measurement as dosimetry of individual electron FLASH beam pulses.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2026Article
- Imaging system for real-time, full-field pulse-by-pulse surface dosimetry of UHDR electron beams.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Verification of dose and dose rate for quality assurance of spread-out-Bragg-peak proton FLASH radiotherapy using machine log files.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Development of patient-specific pre-treatment verification procedure for FLASH proton therapy based on time resolved film dosimetry.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Development of a three-dimensional scintillation detector for pencil beam verification in proton therapy patient-specific quality assurance.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Assessment of scintillation and Cherenkov imaging as beam shape verification method in CyberKnife® radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- High spatiotemporal resolution scintillation imaging of pulsed pencil beam scanning proton beams produced by a gantry-mounted synchrocyclotron.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Two-dimensional time-resolved scintillating sheet monitoring of proton pencil beam scanning FLASH mouse irradiations.Medical physics · 2024Article
- A prototype scintillator real-time beam monitor for ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Article
- Framework for Quality Assurance of Ultrahigh Dose Rate Clinical Trials Investigating FLASH Effects and Current Technology Gaps.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Review
- Ultra-fast, high spatial resolution single-pulse scintillation imaging of synchrocyclotron pencil beam scanning proton delivery.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Spatial and temporal dosimetry of individual electron FLASH beam pulses using radioluminescence imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Technical Note: Single-pulse beam characterization for FLASH-RT using optical imaging in a water tank.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this work was to create a technique that could measure all possible spatial and temporal delivery rates used in pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. The proposed system used a fast scintillation screen for full-field imaging to resolve temporal and spatial patterns as it was delivered. A fast intensified CMOS camera used continuous mode with 10 ms temporal frame rate and 1 × 1 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.