ArticleMedical image analysis2020
Automatic spatial estimation of white matter hyperintensities evolution in brain MRI using disease evolution predictor deep neural networks.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of automated white matter lesion segmentation approaches for use in large, multi-site data analyses in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Forecasting individualized progression of Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI and population spatiotemporal priors.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- AI in Neurology: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once Part 1: Principles and Practice.Annals of neurology · 2025Review
- Pioneering new paths: the role of generative modelling in neurological disease research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Prediction of white matter hyperintensities evolution one-year post-stroke from a single-point brain MRI and stroke lesions information.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence-based magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cerebral small vessel disease.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Individualised prediction of longitudinal change in multimodal brain imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Applications of generative adversarial networks in neuroimaging and clinical neuroscience.NeuroImage · 2023Review
- Prediction of Lung Nodule Progression with an Uncertainty-Aware Hierarchical Probabilistic Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Small Vessel Disease, a Marker of Brain Health: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated that white matter hyperintensities (WMH), the main radiological feature of small vessel disease, may evolve (i.e., shrink, grow) or stay stable over a period of time. Predicting these changes are challenging because it involves some unknown clinical risk factors that leads to a non-deterministic prediction task. In this study, we propose a deep learning model to predict the evolution of WMH from baseline to follow-up (i.e., 1-year later), namely "Disease Evolution Predictor" (DEP) model, which can be adjusted to become a non-deterministic model. The DEP model receives a baseline image as input and produces a map called "Disease Evolution Map" (DEM), which represents the evolution of WMH from baseline to follow-up. Two DEP models are proposed, namely DEP-UResNet and DEP-GAN, which are representatives of the supervised (i.e., need expert-generated manual labels to generate the output) and unsupervised (i.e., do not require manual labels produced by experts) deep learning algorithms respectively. To simulate the non-deterministic and unknown parameters involved in WMH evolution, we modulate a Gaussian noise array to the DEP model as auxiliary input. This forces the DEP model to imitate a wider spectrum of alternatives in the prediction results. The alternatives of using other types of auxiliary input instead, such as baseline WMH and stroke lesion loads are also proposed and tested. Based on our experiments, the fully supervised machine learning scheme DEP-UResNet regularly performed better than the DEP-GAN which works in principle without using any expert-generated label (i.e., unsupervised). However, a semi-supervised DEP-GAN model, which uses probability maps produced by a supervised segmentation method in the learning process, yielded similar performances to the DEP-UResNet and performed best in the clinical evaluation. Furthermore, an ablation study showed that an auxiliary input, especially the Gaussian noise, improved the performance of DEP models compared to DEP models that lacked the auxiliary input regardless of the model's architecture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first extensive study on modelling WMH evolution using deep learning algorithms, which deals with the non-deterministic nature of WMH evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.