Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32428428›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2020

Introduction to Metamodeling for Reducing Computational Burden of Advanced Analyses with Health Economic Models: A Structured Overview of Metamodeling Methods in a 6-Step Application Process.

Koen Degeling, Maarten J IJzerman, Mariel S Lavieri, Mark Strong, Hendrik Koffijberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Meta-Modeling as a Variance-Reduction Technique for Stochastic Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  3. Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  4. Emulator-based Bayesian calibration of the CISNET colorectal cancer models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. When Is Mass Prophylaxis Cost-Effective for Epidemic Control? A Comparison of Decision Approaches.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Metamodeling for Policy Simulations with Multivariate Outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  8. Personalization of Medical Treatment Decisions: Simplifying Complex Models while Maintaining Patient Health Outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  9. Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Koen DegelingHealth Technology and Services Research Department, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-2491
Maarten J IJzermanVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Mariel S LavieriIndustrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mark StrongSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Hendrik KoffijbergHealth Technology and Services Research Department, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, the Netherlands.
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metamodels can be used to reduce the computational burden associated with computationally demanding analyses of simulation models, although applications within health economics are still scarce. Besides a lack of awareness of their potential within health economics, the absence of guidance on the conceivably complex and time-consuming process of developing and validating metamodels may contribute to their limited uptake. To address these issues, this article introduces metamodeling to the wider health economic audience and presents a process for applying metamodeling in this context, including suitable methods and directions for their selection and use. General (i.e., non-health economic specific) metamodeling literature, clinical prediction modeling literature, and a previously published literature review were exploited to consolidate a process and to identify candidate metamodeling methods. Methods were considered applicable to health economics if they are able to account for mixed (i.e., continuous and discrete) input parameters and continuous outcomes. Six steps were identified as relevant for applying metamodeling methods within health economics: 1) the identification of a suitable metamodeling technique, 2) simulation of data sets according to a design of experiments, 3) fitting of the metamodel, 4) assessment of metamodel performance, 5) conducting the required analysis using the metamodel, and 6) verification of the results. Different methods are discussed to support each step, including their characteristics, directions for use, key references, and relevant R and Python packages. To address challenges regarding metamodeling methods selection, a first guide was developed toward using metamodels to reduce the computational burden of analyses of health economic models. This guidance may increase applications of metamodeling in health economics, enabling increased use of state-of-the-art analyses (e.g., value of information analysis) with computationally burdensome simulation models.

Indexed as

Mathematical ComputingComputer SimulationDecision Support TechniquesEconomics, MedicalHumanscomputational burdenemulatorsmetamodelingsimulationsurrogate models

Identifiers

PMID32428428
PMCPMC7754830
OpenAlexW3017688946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.