Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32428211›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Functional preservation and enhanced capacity for visual restoration in subacute occipital stroke.

Elizabeth L Saionz, Duje Tadin, Michael D Melnick, Krystel R Huxlin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05085210 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsVisual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment, HemianopsiaArmstranscranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training, Sham stimulation, Virtual Reality Based Visual Training
NCT07185971 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

PAVE (Parallactic Visual-Field Enhancement) System for Treatment of Chronic Visual Field Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuroAEye LLCRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsHomonymous Hemianopsia, Homonymous QuadrantanopiaArmsPAVE (Parallactic Visual-Field Enhancement) treatment using a virtual reality head mounted display
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. From error to evidence: blindsight in the making†.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth L SaionzFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Duje TadinFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Michael D MelnickFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Krystel R HuxlinFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
University of Rochester Mentoring Environment: Nurturing Training Opportunities in Research (UR-MENTOR)T32GM007356 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI O'BANION, M. KERRY · 1985 to 2023
$15.1M
VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Vision recovery in cortical blindnessR01EY027314 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MARISA CARRASCO, Krystel R Huxlin · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002000 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI THAKAR, JUILEE, VAN WIJNGAARDEN, EDWIN · 2016 to 2024
$4.1M
Mechanisms of visual learning in cortical blindnessR01EY021209 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUXLIN, KRYSTEL R · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002000NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021209NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027314NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes a loss of vision known as hemianopia or cortically-induced blindness. While perimetric visual field improvements can occur spontaneously in the first few months post-stroke, by 6 months post-stroke, the deficit is considered chronic and permanent. Despite evidence from sensorimotor stroke showing that early injury responses heighten neuroplastic potential, to date, visual rehabilitation research has focused on patients with chronic cortically-induced blindness. Consequently, little is known about the functional properties of the post-stroke visual system in the subacute period, nor do we know if these properties can be harnessed to enhance visual recovery. Here, for the first time, we show that 'conscious' visual discrimination abilities are often preserved inside subacute, perimetrically-defined blind fields, but they disappear by ∼6 months post-stroke. Complementing this discovery, we now show that training initiated subacutely can recover global motion discrimination and integration, as well as luminance detection perimetry, just as it does in chronic cortically-induced blindness. However, subacute recovery was attained six times faster; it also generalized to deeper, untrained regions of the blind field, and to other (untrained) aspects of motion perception, preventing their degradation upon reaching the chronic period. In contrast, untrained subacutes exhibited spontaneous improvements in luminance detection perimetry, but spontaneous recovery of motion discriminations was never observed. Thus, in cortically-induced blindness, the early post-stroke period appears characterized by gradual-rather than sudden-loss of visual processing. Subacute training stops this degradation, and is far more efficient at eliciting recovery than identical training in the chronic period. Finally, spontaneous visual improvements in subacutes were restricted to luminance detection; discrimination abilities only recovered following deliberate training. Our findings suggest that after V1 damage, rather than waiting for vision to stabilize, early training interventions may be key to maximize the system's potential for recovery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlindness, CorticalFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionNeuronal PlasticityOccipital LobeStrokeStroke RehabilitationVision, OcularVisual Cortexhemianopiaperceptual learningrehabilitationtrainingvision

Identifiers

PMID32428211
PMCPMC7296857
OpenAlexW3027848346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.