Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32428018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Aortopathies in mouse models of Pompe, Fabry and Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB lysosomal storage diseases.

Maria Paola Belfiore, Francesca Iacobellis, Emma Acampora, Martina Caiazza, Marta Rubino, Emanuele Monda, Maria Rosaria Magaldi, Antonietta Tarallo, Marcella Sasso, Valeria De Pasquale and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Basis of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Cardiomyopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Paola BelfioreDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesca IacobellisDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Emma AcamporaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Martina CaiazzaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marta RubinoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Emanuele MondaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Maria Rosaria MagaldiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonietta TaralloDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Marcella SassoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Valeria De PasqualeDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Roberto GrassiDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Salvatore CappabiancaDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Paolo CalabròDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Simona FecarottaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore EspositoUnit of Pathological Anatomy, Aversa Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Giovanni EspositoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Antonio PisaniDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Luigi Michele PavoneDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Giancarlo ParentiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe LimongelliDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-9517
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are rare inherited metabolic diseases characterized by an abnormal accumulation of various toxic materials in the cells as a result of enzyme deficiencies leading to tissue and organ damage. Among clinical manifestations, cardiac diseases are particularly important in Pompe glycogen storage diseases (PD), in glycosphingolipidosis Fabry disease (FD), and mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS). Here, we evaluated the occurrence of aortopathy in knock out (KO) mouse models of three different LSDs, including PD, FD, and MPS IIIB.

methodsWe measured the aortic diameters in 15 KO male mice, 5 for each LSD: 5 GLA-/- mice for FD, 5 NAGLU-/- mice for MPS IIIB, 5 GAA-/- mice for PD, and 15 wild type (WT) mice: 5 for each strain. In order to compare the aortic parameters between KO and WT mice deriving from the same colonies, different diameters were echocardiographically measured: aortic annulus, aortic sinus, sino-tubular junction, ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta. Storage material content and aortic defects of the KO mice were also analyzed by histology, when available.

resultsCompared to their correspondent WT mice: GAA-/- mice showed greater diameters of ascending aorta (1.61mm vs. 1.11mm, p-value = 0.01) and descending aorta (1.17mm vs 1.02mm, p-value 0.04); GLA-/- mice showed greater diameters of aortic annulus (1.35mm vs. 1.22mm, p-value = 0.01), sinus of Valsalva (1.6mm vs. 1.38mm, p-value<0.01), ascending aorta (1.57mm vs. 1.34mm, p-value<0.01), aortic arch (1.36mm vs. 1.22mm, p-value = 0.03) and descending aorta (1.29mm vs. 1.11mm, p-value<0.01); NAGLU-/- mice showed greater diameters of sinus of Valsalva (1.46mm vs. 1.31mm, p-value = 0.05), ascending aorta (1.42mm vs. 1.29mm, p-value<0.01), aortic arch (1.34mm vs. 1.28mm, p-value<0.01) and descending aorta (1.18mm vs. 1.1mm, p-value 0.01).

conclusionsWe evaluated for the first time the aortic diameters in 3 LSD mouse models and identified different aortopathy patterns, in concordance with recent human findings. Our results are relevant in view of using KO mouse models for efficiently testing the efficacy of new therapies on distinct cardiovascular aspects of LSDs.

Indexed as

Acetylglucosaminidasealpha-Galactosidasealpha-GlucosidasesAnimalsAortic DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyFabry DiseaseGlycogen Storage Disease Type IILysosomal Storage DiseasesMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMucopolysaccharidosis IIIAcetylglucosaminidasealpha-Galactosidasealpha-Glucosidasesalpha-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase

Identifiers

PMID32428018
PMCPMC7236983
OpenAlexW3028566816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.