Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427957›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Blink Rate Patterns Provide a Reliable Measure of Individual Engagement with Scene Content.

Carolyn Ranti, Warren Jones, Ami Klin, Sarah Shultz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Astaxanthin (AstaRealAdvances in therapy · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Autism Digital Phenotyping in Preschool- and School-Age Children.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn RantiMarcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, USA.
Warren JonesMarcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, USA.
Ami KlinMarcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-4263
Sarah ShultzMarcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, USA. sarah.shultz@emory.edu.
Emory University · US

Funding

The ontogeny of social vocal engagement and its derailment in autismP50MH100029 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BACHEVALIER, JOCELYNE H · 2012 to 2021
$20.1M
Pathogenic insight into ASD from the study of neonatal brain-behavior transitionsK01MH108741 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHULTZ, SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$857k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH108741NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye-blinking has emerged as a promising means of measuring viewer engagement with visual content. This method capitalizes on the fact that although we remain largely unaware of our eye-blinking in everyday situations, eye-blinks are inhibited at precise moments in time so as to minimize the loss of visual information that occurs during a blink. Probabilistically, the more important the visual information is to the viewer, the more likely he or she will be to inhibit blinking. In the present study, viewer engagement was experimentally manipulated in order to: (1) replicate past studies suggesting that a group of viewers will blink less often when watching content that they perceive as more important or relevant; (2) test the reliability of the measure by investigating constraints on the timescale over which blink rate patterns can be used to accurately quantify viewer engagement; and (3) examine whether blink rate patterns can be used to quantify what an individual - as opposed to a group of viewers-perceives as engaging. Results demonstrate that blink rate patterns can be used to measure changes in individual and group engagement that unfold over relatively short (1 second) and long (60 second) timescales. However, for individuals with lower blink rates, blink rate patterns may provide less optimal measures when engagement shifts rapidly (at intervals of 1 second or less). Findings support the use of eye-blink measures in future studies investigating a person's subjective perception of how engaging a stimulus is.

Indexed as

AwarenessBlinkingAdultFemaleHumansKineticsMaleMiddle AgedOcular Physiological PhenomenaVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32427957
PMCPMC7237680
OpenAlexW3026845050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.