ArticleScientific reports2020
Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Snowmelt predicts earlier breeding across the latitudinal range of an Arctic nesting seabird, the Little Auk (Alle alle).The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Sex differences in foraging ecology of the chick rearing Brünnich's Guillemots (Uria lomvia) breeding in a High Arctic colony.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inter- and intra-annual differences in foraging ecology of the chick-rearing Brünnich's guillemots (Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Decline in the West Greenland population of a zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sex differences in foraging ecology of a zooplanktivorous little auk Alle alle during the pre-laying period: insights from remote sensing and animal-tracking.Frontiers in zoology · 2024Article
- The first evidence of alloparental feeding in a crevice-nesting seabird, the little auk.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Coordination of parental performance is breeding phase-dependent in the Dovekie (Alle alle), a pelagic Arctic seabird.PloS one · 2024Article
- Molecular tools prove little auks from Svalbard are extremely selective for Calanus glacialis even when exposed to Atlantification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Use of geolocators for investigating breeding ecology of a rock crevice-nesting seabird: Method validation and impact assessment.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Post-foraging in-colony behaviour of a central-place foraging seabird.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- In a comfort zone and beyond-Ecological plasticity of key marine mediators.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Interannual variation in foraging decisions in chick-rearing black-legged kittiwakes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
- How do resource distribution and taxonomy affect the use of dual foraging in seabirds? A review.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using GPS-tracked individuals, we compared foraging ecology and reproductive output of a High-Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle, between three years differing in environmental conditions (sea surface temperature). Despite contrasting environmental conditions, average foraging fights distance and duration were generally similar in all studied years. Also, in all years foraging locations visited by the little auk parents during short trips (ST, for chick provisioning) were significantly closer to the colony compared to those visited during long trips (LTs, mainly for adults' self-maintenance). Nevertheless, we also found some differences in the little auk foraging behaviour: duration of LTs was the longest in the coldest year suggesting more time for resting for adults compared to warmer years. Besides, birds foraged closer to the colony and in significantly colder water in the coldest year. Interestingly, these differences did not affect chick diet: in all the years, the energy content of food loads was similar, with the Arctic copepod, Calanus glacialis copepodite stage V being the most preferred prey item (>73% of items by number and >67% by energy content). Also chick survival was similar in all the study years. However, when examining chicks growth rate we found that their peak body mass was lower in warmer years suggesting that overall conditions in the two warm years were less favourable. While our results, demonstrate a great foraging flexibility by little auks, they also point out their vulnerability to changing environmental conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.