Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427759›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic drug monitoring2020

Model-Informed Bayesian Estimation Improves the Prediction of Morphine Exposure in Neonates and Infants.

Joshua C Euteneuer, Tomoyuki Mizuno, Tsuyoshi Fukuda, Junfang Zhao, Kenneth D R Setchell, Louis J Muglia, Alexander A Vinks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. The Coming of Age of Model-Informed Precision Therapeutics for Children.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua C EuteneuerDivision of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Tomoyuki MizunoDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Tsuyoshi FukudaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Junfang ZhaoDivision of Pathology, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; and.
Kenneth D R SetchellDivision of Pathology, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; and.
Louis J MugliaDivision of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Alexander A VinksDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
T32 Cincinnati Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32HD069054 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI TRACY A GLAUSER, Sonya C Tang Girdwood · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD069054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain control in infants is an important clinical concern, with potential long-term adverse neurodevelopmental effects. Intravenous morphine is routinely administered for postoperative pain management; however, its dose-concentration-response relationship in neonates and infants has not been well characterized. Although the current literature provides dosing guidelines for the average infant, it fails to control for the large unexplained variability in morphine clearance and response in individual patients. Bayesian estimation can be used to control for some of this variability. The authors aimed to evaluate morphine pharmacokinetics (PKs) and exposure in critically ill neonates and infants receiving standard-of-care morphine therapy and compare a population-based approach to the model-informed Bayesian techniques.

methodsThe PKs and exposure of morphine and its active metabolites were evaluated in a prospective opportunistic PK study using 221 discarded blood samples from 57 critically ill neonates and infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Thereafter, a population-based PK model was compared with a Bayesian adaptive control strategy to predict an individual's PK profile and morphine exposure over time.

resultsAmong the critically ill neonates and infants, morphine clearance showed substantial variability with a 40-fold range (ie, 2.2 to 87.1, mean 23.7 L/h/70 kg). Compared with the observed morphine concentrations, the population-model based predictions had an R of 0.13, whereas the model-based Bayesian predictions had an R of 0.61.

conclusionsModel-informed Bayesian estimation is a better predictor of morphine exposure than PK models alone in critically ill neonates and infants. A large variability was also identified in morphine clearance. A further study is warranted to elucidate the predictive covariates and precision dosing strategies that use morphine concentration and pain scores as feedbacks.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCritical IllnessFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMorphinePainProspective StudiesMorphine

Identifiers

PMID32427759
PMCPMC7501088
OpenAlexW3028561431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.