ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020
Mobile App for Symptom Management and Associated Quality of Life During Systemic Treatment in Early Stage Breast Cancer: Nonrandomized Controlled Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of using app-based interventions on quality of life among breast cancer patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the Evidence on the Impact of mHealth Interventions on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mobile Health in Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2023Pooled it
- Mobile Apps and Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer and Survivors: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of connected health interventions on psychological wellbeing and quality of life in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psycho-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Design and Usability Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Postoperative Self-Management in Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of an integrated mHealth supportive care program on symptom burden and self-efficacy in post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Preferences for electronic health information support concerning chemotherapy adverse reactions among young and middle-aged breast cancer patients based on the Kano model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- TreC_Metha: A Digital Application to Enhance Patient Agency, Therapy Compliance and Quality of Life in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Methodological approaches and author-reported limitations in evaluation studies of digital health technologies (DHT): A scoping review of DHT interventions for cancer, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Patients' daily reporting of symptoms via mobile application reveals a significant difference between patients' perceptions and doctors' interpretations.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Mobile Applications in Breast Cancer Postoperative Care: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Addressing the unmet needs of women with breast cancer in Mexico: a non-randomised pilot study of the digital ePRO intervention.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Are All Societies Ready for Digital Tools? Feasibility Study on the Use of Mobile Application in Polish Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Perioperative Chemotherapy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Changes in the quality of life of early breast cancer patients and comparison with the normative Slovenian population.Radiology and oncology · 2023Article
- Translation and validation of the Pancreatic Cancer Disease Impact score for Chinese patients with pancreatic cancer: A methodological and cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Article
- A Scoping Review and a Taxonomy to Assess the Impact of Mobile Apps on Cancer Care Management.Cancers · 2023Article
- Prognostic Impact of Nutritional Status on Overall Survival and Health-Related Quality of Life in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer.Nutrients · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding patients with cancer who are undergoing systemic therapy with useful information about symptom management is essential to prevent unnecessary deterioration of quality of life.
objectiveThe aim was to evaluate whether use of an app for symptom management was associated with any change in patient quality of life or use of health resources.
methodsOutpatients with early stage breast cancer receiving systemic therapy were recruited at the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Patients who received systemic therapy between December 2017 and March 2018 (control group) and between April 2018 and September 2018 (intervention group) were eligible. All patients received standard care, but only those in the intervention group were asked to use mPRO Mamma, an Android-based smartphone app, in addition. The app supported daily tracking of 50 symptoms, allowed users to grade their symptom severity (as mild, moderate, or severe), and also provided in-depth descriptions and recommendations based on reported symptom level. Patient-reported outcomes in both groups were assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core (C-30) and breast cancer (BR-23) questionnaires, as well as a questionnaire about health resources use. The primary outcomes were the difference in the global quality of life between groups and the difference in summary score of the EORTC C-30 questionnaire between groups after 3 time periods (the first week of treatment, the first treatment cycle, and the entire treatment). The secondary outcome was the use of health resources (doctor visits and hospitalizations) in each time period. Other scales were used for exploratory analysis.
resultsThe mean difference between the intervention group (n=46) and the control group (n=45) in global quality of life (adjusted for baseline and type of surgery) after the first week was 10.1 (95% CI 1.8 to 18.5, P=.02). The intervention group summary scores were significantly higher than those of the control group after the first week (adjusted mean difference: 8.9, 95% CI 3.1 to 14.7, P=.003) and at the end of treatment (adjusted mean difference: 10.6, 95% CI 3.9 to 17.3, P=.002). Use of health resources was not statistically significant between the groups in either the first week (P=.12) or the first treatment cycle (P=.13). Exploratory analysis findings demonstrated clinically important improvements (indicated by EORTC C-30 or BR-23 scale scores)-social, physical, role, and cognitive function were improved while pain, appetite loss, and systemic therapy side effects were reduced.
conclusionsUse of the app enabled patients undergoing systemic therapy for early stage breast cancer to better cope with symptoms which was demonstrated by a better global quality of life and summary score after the first week and by a better summary score at the end of treatment in the intervention group compared to those of the control group, but no change in the use of health resources was demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.