Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427564›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

SpikeForest, reproducible web-facing ground-truth validation of automated neural spike sorters.

Jeremy Magland, James J Jun, Elizabeth Lovero, Alexander J Morley, Cole Lincoln Hurwitz, Alessio Paolo Buccino, Samuel Garcia, Alex H Barnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. KIASORT: Knowledge-Integrated Automated Spike Sorting for Geometry-Free Neuron Tracking.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Human Insula Reimagined: Single Neurons Respond to Simple Sounds during Passive Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. High performance sorting of motor unit action potentials with EMUsort.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeremy MaglandCenter for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-4375
James J JunCenter for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.
Elizabeth LoveroScientific Computing Core, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2642-603X
Alexander J MorleyMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-4063
Cole Lincoln HurwitzInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-1653
Alessio Paolo BuccinoCentre for IntegrativeNeuroplasticity (CINPLA), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Samuel GarciaCentre de Recherche en Neuroscience de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alex H BarnettCenter for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spike sorting is a crucial step in electrophysiological studies of neuronal activity. While many spike sorting packages are available, there is little consensus about which are most accurate under different experimental conditions. SpikeForest is an open-source and reproducible software suite that benchmarks the performance of automated spike sorting algorithms across an extensive, curated database of ground-truth electrophysiological recordings, displaying results interactively on a continuously-updating website. With contributions from eleven laboratories, our database currently comprises 650 recordings (1.3 TB total size) with around 35,000 ground-truth units. These data include paired intracellular/extracellular recordings and state-of-the-art simulated recordings. Ten of the most popular spike sorting codes are wrapped in a Python package and evaluated on a compute cluster using an automated pipeline. SpikeForest documents community progress in automated spike sorting, and guides neuroscientists to an optimal choice of sorter and parameters for a wide range of probes and brain regions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsReproducibility of Resultselectrophysiologyground truthneurosciencenonereproducibilityspike sortingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID32427564
PMCPMC7237210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.